arbitration

arbitration legal skills by jurisdiction

Arbitration work is governed by a web of overlapping sources — seat law, institutional rules, bilateral investment treaties, and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards — and keeping them straight across multiple jurisdictions is where errors and delays accumulate. The arbitration legal skills assembled in the ThomasMore catalog are built for exactly that coordination problem, covering drafting and reviewing arbitration clauses, selecting seats and institutional rules, preparing procedural submissions, and assessing enforcement prospects under applicable conventions and domestic regimes. Every skill is agent-ready, meaning your AI agent can execute a discrete, reusable task — pulling challenge grounds under a seat's arbitration statute, mapping award-recognition steps in a target country, or checking a clause against institutional requirements — and each is accessible over MCP or as a direct download.

Authors contributing to this collection span commercial arbitration, investment arbitration under treaty frameworks, and domestic statutory regimes across major seats including common law and civil law systems. The open-source skills in the ThomasMore catalog are updated as institutional rule sets are revised and national arbitration legislation evolves. Filter by jurisdiction to anchor the work in a specific seat's procedural law, or search across the full collection to find a capability that matches the institutional framework your matter is running under.