Litigation
Skills
Skill:因果关系推论
因果关系推论技能,用于构建从对方行为到用户损害的完整因果链,识别中间事实节点、排查替代原因、区分损失类型并生成补证建议。适用于需证明损害因果关系或反驳"非我所致""损失过远""用户自身原因"等抗辩的场景。
Skill:对方视角与抗辩模拟
Simulates the opposing party's litigation and negotiation strategy by mapping their likely factual narrative, categorizing defenses, predicting evide…
Skill:案件摄入与争议焦点识别
用于案件初始摄入阶段,将零散事实叙述转化为结构化案件概要,区分事实、推测、评价与法律结论,识别争议焦点层级关系及证据缺口,为后续证据台账、要件矩阵和策略分析提供基础。
Skill:案例参考与规则学习
设计并执行案例、法规、判决文件和裁判观点的检索学习流程,优先使用所属国家/管辖权的官方来源,支持浏览器、官方网页、权威数据库和外部搜索工具,避免编造案例并提炼可迁移规则。
Skill:法律文书与沟通文本起草
起草、改写或审查法律相关文本,包括沟通信、事实确认函、律师函草稿、投诉材料、起诉状/答辩状框架、总结报告、合同审查总结和合同草案等。
Skill:法律要件与证明责任矩阵
Breaks a legal claim into elements, maps each to facts and evidence, assigns burden of proof, and identifies evidentiary gaps and defense angles. Use…
Stateless Case File Analyzer (Ralph Loop Edition)
Use when running structured, adversarial analysis across large case-file directories — extracts facts, claims, and legal views into XML metadata via …
status
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules…
Status
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules).
status-anthropics
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules…
Subpoena Triage
Triage a subpoena served on the company — classify it, analyze scope/burden/privilege, cross-check the portfolio, and produce an objections framework…
subpoena-triage
Triage a subpoena served on the company — classify it, analyze scope/burden/privilege, cross-check the portfolio, and produce an objections framework…
subpoena-triage-anthropics
Triage a subpoena served on the company — classify it, analyze scope/burden/privilege, cross-check the portfolio, and produce an objections framework…
Summary Judgment Analysis
Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case …
Tender of Defense Letter
Drafts a contractual tender of defense letter demanding a contracting party assume defense and indemnification in pending litigation. Analyzes indemn…
Vollmacht für Familienmitglieder und Mitreisende
Erzeugt Vollmachten für Mitreisende (Familienmitglieder Freunde) damit der Hauptansprechpartner deren Fluggastrechtsanspruch im Schriftverkehr und im…
Witness Statement Summary
Generates structured summaries of witness statements for litigation, extracting chronological narratives, key facts, credibility indicators, and evid…
사건기록 검색 스킬 (case-records)
사무소 과거 사건기록을 로컬 FTS로 검색. 명시적으로 외부 임베딩을 허용한 환경에서는 하이브리드 검색도 가능. 우리측 서면·상대측 서면·판결문 검색하여 "비슷한 사건이 있었나, 우리가 어떻게 주장했나, 법원이 어떻게 판단했나"에 답한다. 사건 0건일 때는 검색 시도…
litigation legal skills for GENERAL
Cross-border litigation sits at the intersection of competing procedural codes, conflicting service-of-process regimes, and enforcement questions that no single domestic rulebook resolves — work where a practitioner must hold multiple systems in mind simultaneously and move quickly when limitation windows diverge. The litigation legal skills for general cross-jurisdiction matters in the ThomasMore catalog are built precisely for that tension, covering pre-action strategy, pleadings drafts, jurisdictional analysis, discovery and disclosure coordination, and enforcement of foreign judgments across a wide range of forums.
Each skill is agent-ready, surfacing comparative procedural checkpoints or drafting dispute clauses that survive scrutiny in more than one court system, reachable over MCP or available as a download to fit your existing workflow. The collection draws on open-source contributions maintained as civil procedure rules, treaty frameworks, and international commercial arbitration practice continue to evolve. Cross-jurisdiction litigation demands precision at every step — choice of forum, interim relief, evidence gathering across borders — and these skills are designed to support that precision without substituting your judgment. Use the jurisdiction filters above to narrow the catalog to the procedural rules and enforcement landscape where your matter is actually being fought.