Third-Party Complaint (Impleader)
Drafts a Third-Party Complaint (impleader) under FRCP 14 or state equivalents. Use when a defendant needs to implead a party for indemnification, contribution, subrogation, or breach of warranty during the pleadings phase.
Third-Party Complaint (Impleader)
Produces an FRCP 14 / state-equivalent third-party complaint asserting derivative liability against an impleaded party.
Prerequisites
- Original complaint — full copy for Exhibit A and incorporation by reference
- Derivative-liability basis — indemnification contracts, insurance policies, warranties, or common-law indemnity/contribution facts
- Third-party defendant identity — legal name, registered agent, service address
- Jurisdictional facts — party citizenship (diversity), personal-jurisdiction contacts, venue basis
- Timing status — within 14 days of original answer (as of right) or leave required
Workflow
1. Caption & Introduction
- Full court name, division, original case number
- Party designations: Plaintiff; Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff; Third-Party Defendant
- Title: "THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT"
- Opening paragraph citing FRCP 14(a) / state rule and purpose of liability shifting
2. Procedural Posture
- Summarize original complaint: claims, theories, relief sought
- State: "The Complaint is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference"
- Note answer date and timeliness of third-party filing
3. Jurisdiction & Venue
| Type | Basis |
|---|---|
| Subject matter | Federal question, diversity (complete + amount), or supplemental under § 1367 |
| Personal jurisdiction | Contacts, consent, or long-arm statute |
| Venue | § 1391 or applicable state rule |
4. Factual Allegations
Present chronologically. Must establish:
- Relationship between Defendant/TPP and Third-Party Defendant
- Specific agreements creating indemnification/defense/warranty obligations — quote key language verbatim
- Third-Party Defendant's acts or omissions contributing to Plaintiff's alleged harm
- Notice to Third-Party Defendant (dates, method, demands, response)
- Causal chain: TPD conduct → Defendant's exposure → Plaintiff's claims
5. Counts
Structure each as a separate numbered count from applicable theories:
| Theory | Key Elements |
|---|---|
| Contractual Indemnification | Quote provision; claims fall within scope; conditions precedent met |
| Common-Law Indemnification | Defendant's liability purely passive/vicarious; TPD is actual wrongdoer |
| Contribution | Both at fault; apportion per comparative-fault principles |
| Breach of Contract/Warranty | Obligation, breach, causation to Defendant's exposure |
| Subrogation | Defendant already paid; TPD bears ultimate responsibility |
Per count: incorporate factual paragraphs by reference, state elements, identify governing law, conclude with entitlement to judgment.
6. Prayer for Relief
Request: (a) judgment for all sums adjudged against Defendant including settlements; (b) full indemnification or contribution; (c) defense costs and attorney's fees (cite contractual or statutory basis); (d) declaratory relief on duty to defend/indemnify; (e) pre- and post-judgment interest; (f) costs of third-party action; (g) further just relief.
7. Signature Block
Standard attorney signature with Rule 11 / state-equivalent certification.
Critical Checks
- Timing: Within 14 days of serving original answer → as of right (FRCP 14(a)(1)). After → motion for leave required.
- Derivative liability only: FRCP 14 requires claims derivative of the original action. Independent claims need separate counterclaim/crossclaim or independent jurisdiction.
- Service: Must serve TPD with the third-party complaint AND original complaint plus all prior pleadings.
- Contract language: Quote indemnification provisions verbatim — never paraphrase trigger language or scope limitations.
- Supplemental jurisdiction: § 1367 typically covers third-party claims, but confirm no statutory exception applies.
- State variations: Check local timing rules, leave requirements, and contribution statutes (UCFA vs. joint-and-several jurisdictions).
- Party consistency: "Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff" on first reference, then "Defendant/TPP" throughout.
- Rule 11: Every factual allegation must have evidentiary support or be likely to after reasonable investigation.
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…
30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …
Abstract of Judgment
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…
Amicus Brief
Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…
Amicus Coalition Management
Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…