Marketplace Pricing Download

Motion for Summary Judgment

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.

ID: us.litigation.summary-judgment-motion Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: CaseMark Language: en Added: 2026-05-27
⬇ Download

Motion for Summary Judgment

Produces a complete MSJ filing package showing no genuine dispute of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 56 or state equivalent.

Prerequisites

Collect before drafting:

  1. Complaint & Answer — all claims/defenses at issue
  2. Discovery record — depositions, interrogatory responses, RFAs, document productions with Bates numbers
  3. Jurisdiction & local rules — page limits, separate-statement requirements, briefing schedule, formatting
  4. Contracts/policies — if breach or coverage claims involved
  5. Expert reports — if needed for causation, damages, or standard of care

Filing Package Components

1. Caption & Notice of Motion

Include: full court name, case title (all parties per operative pleading), case number, document title ("Motion for Summary Judgment" or "Partial"), exact claims/counts sought, FRCP 56 or state rule citation, hearing date if required, and list of supporting documents.

2. Memorandum of Points and Authorities

Draft in this order:

  1. Introduction (1–2 paragraphs) — parties, claims, why MSJ is warranted
  2. Statement of the Case — procedural history + factual background with record citations
  3. Legal Standard — cite the trilogy plus controlling circuit/state authority:
    • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
    • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986)
    • Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986)
  4. Argument — per claim/defense: identify elements under governing law → map to undisputed evidence → show opponent lacks evidence for genuine dispute → address counterarguments → cite analogous MSJ grants with parentheticals
  5. Conclusion — restate entitlement, request specific relief

3. Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (SUF)

Numbered paragraphs. Each fact must be a single discrete assertion, material to an element, with pinpoint citation to admissible evidence.

Citation formats:

Type Format
Deposition [Name] Dep. [page]:[line]–[line]
Interrogatory [Party] Resp. to Interrog. No. [#], at [page]
Document [Description], [Bates range] or Ex. [letter]
RFA [Party] Resp. to RFA No. [#]
Declaration [Name] Decl. ¶ [#]

Cross-check every fact against source documents for accuracy of quotes, dates, and figures.

4. Supporting Declarations

Each declaration must: open with personal-knowledge/competency statement; contain only direct-knowledge facts (no conclusions, speculation, or "information and belief"); authenticate exhibits by reference; close with perjury declaration for the relevant jurisdiction.

Draft for: moving party, percipient witnesses, expert witnesses (if applicable), custodian of records.

5. Proposed Order

1–2 pages: grants MSJ on specified claims/counts, states no-genuine-dispute finding, directs judgment entry or identifies remaining claims (if partial), includes signature line per local rules.

6. Signature Block & Certifications

Attorney identification (name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email), certificate of service, word-count certification (if required), meet-and-confer certification (if required).

Critical Checks

  • Viewing standard: present all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, then show judgment is still compelled
  • Admissibility gate: every cited item must be trial-admissible — authenticate documents, verify personal-knowledge basis, apply hearsay rules
  • Pinpoint citations: never cite depositions or documents generally; always include page, line, or Bates number
  • Bluebook format: use Bluebook unless local rules specify otherwise
  • Local rule compliance: verify page limits, font/margins, separate-statement format, and jurisdiction-specific MSJ procedures before finalizing
  • Partial MSJ: clearly delineate which claims are addressed vs. which remain for trial
  • PI element mapping: for personal injury claims, map evidence to duty, breach, causation (actual + proximate), and damages — causation and damages are the most common genuine-dispute battlegrounds

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · litigation

Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Abstract of Judgment

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Brief

Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Coalition Management

Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…

CaseMark