Request for Admissions
Drafts Requests for Admissions under FRCP 36 or state equivalents for personal injury litigation. Extracts facts from case documents to produce numbered admission requests covering factual matters, document authentication, and law-to-fact application. Use when drafting RFAs, narrowing trial issues, authenticating exhibits, or preparing discovery requests.
Request for Admissions
Drafts FRCP 36 / state-equivalent Requests for Admissions that narrow trial issues, establish uncontroverted facts, and authenticate documents.
Prerequisites
Collect before drafting:
- Pleadings — complaint, answer, party names as captioned, docket number, court, judge
- Case documents — contracts, correspondence, medical records, invoices, photos for authentication
- Prior discovery — initial disclosures, interrogatory responses, document productions
- Jurisdiction — federal (FRCP 36) or state rule (e.g., CA CCP §2033.010, TX TRCP 198)
- Local rules — formatting, page limits, RFA number caps (many jurisdictions cap at 25–35)
Quick Start
- Extract key facts from uploaded documents (names, dates, amounts, exhibits)
- Draft numbered requests in logical order: foundational facts → event facts → communications → damages → document authentication
- Include response instructions with deemed-admitted warning
- Add caption, signature block, and certificate of service
Document Extraction
Before drafting, extract from uploaded documents:
| Extract | Examples |
|---|---|
| Party names & roles | Full legal names as captioned |
| Key dates & timeline | Incident, notice, treatment dates |
| Monetary amounts | Medical bills, lost wages, demands |
| Documents to authenticate | Contracts, letters, emails, records |
| Admitted allegations | Facts already admitted in answer |
| Communications | Emails, texts, letters with dates and participants |
Output Structure
Caption & Header
[COURT NAME]
[CASE TITLE — all parties as captioned]
Case No. [DOCKET NUMBER]
[Judge / Track designation if required]
[REQUESTING PARTY]'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO [RESPONDING PARTY]
Set No. [X]
Introduction
- Identify parties by full legal name
- Cite governing rule (FRCP 36 or state equivalent with section number)
- State purpose: narrow issues, establish facts, authenticate documents
Definitions
Include only when specialized terms appear repeatedly. Skip for straightforward cases.
Numbered Requests
Organize in logical progression:
| Category | Order | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Foundational facts | First | Relationships, residence, employment, contract existence |
| Event-specific facts | Second | Incident details, dates, locations, actions |
| Communications | Third | Sending/receipt of documents on specific dates |
| Damages | Fourth | Treatment, amounts billed, payment responsibility |
| Document authentication | Last | Genuineness of attached exhibits |
Drafting rules:
- One fact per request — never compound
- Frame affirmatively ("Admit that X occurred"), not negatively
- Use exact dates, names, amounts from case documents
- No ultimate legal conclusions ("Admit you were negligent")
- No double negatives or trick phrasing
- Attach documents as labeled exhibits for authentication requests
Bad: "Admit that you received the notice on March 15 and failed to respond within thirty days." Good: Two separate requests — one for receipt, one for response timing.
Response Instructions
Include all of:
- Response options: admit, deny, or state in detail why party cannot truthfully admit or deny
- Deadline: 30 days after service (FRCP 36(a)(3)) or jurisdiction-specific period
- Deemed-admitted warning: failure to timely respond = matter deemed admitted under [cite rule]
- Reasonable inquiry obligation: lack of knowledge invalid unless reasonable inquiry made
- Supplementation duty: continuing obligation to correct responses
- Objection requirements: must state with specificity; objection does not excuse answering non-objected portions
Signature Block
Dated: _______________
_________________________
[Attorney Name], [Bar No.]
[Firm Name]
[Address]
[Phone] | [Fax]
[Email]
Attorney for [Requesting Party]
Certificate of Service
- Date and method of service (ECF, email, mail, personal delivery)
- Each party/counsel served with address or email
- Signature of certifying attorney
Pitfalls & Checks
- One fact per request — compound requests invite partial denials
- No legal conclusions — "Admit you were negligent" is improper; stick to factual predicates
- Number limits — check local rules before exceeding 25 RFAs
- Judicial vs. pleading admissions — RFA admissions are binding judicial admissions, stronger than pleading admissions
- Avoid harassing requests — skip matters of public record, opinions, or facts solely within requesting party's knowledge
- Verify exhibits — all referenced exhibits must be properly labeled and attached
- Verify rule citations — confirm all citations are current for the specific jurisdiction [VERIFY]
- Tone — neutral, professional, firm; never argumentative
Key changes made:
- Removed
tagsfrom frontmatter — not part of the Agent Skills spec (onlynameanddescriptionare valid) - Trimmed description — tightened wording while preserving all trigger keywords
- Added Quick Start section — gives the agent a fast 4-step overview before diving into details
- Consolidated Prerequisites — collapsed from numbered list to bullet list, merged formatting rules into local rules bullet
- Flattened Output Structure headings — removed redundant numbering (
### 1. Caption→### Caption & Header) - Consolidated Guidelines into Pitfalls & Checks — merged scattered guidance into a single scannable checklist at the end
- Removed prose padding — cut "Include all of the following", "Organize in logical progression" intros, and other filler phrases
- Reduced line count — from 124 lines to ~105 while preserving all substantive legal content
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…
30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …
Abstract of Judgment
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…
Amicus Brief
Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…
Amicus Coalition Management
Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…