Marketplace Pricing Download

Draft an Oregon Declaration

Use this skill when the user asks to draft a declaration for an Oregon court filing. Triggers include "draft a declaration", "declaration in support", "declaration of defendant", "declaration of plaintiff", "witness declaration", "affidavit" (Oregon uses declarations under penalty of perjury per ORCP 1 E in place of notarized affidavits for most filings), and "declaration with exhibits". Scaffolds a declaration with numbered paragraphs, verification clause (ORCP 1 E), signature block, and optional exhibit cover pages. Composes with `or-statewide-format` (always), `or-multcc` / `or-wccc` / `or-county-courts` (court-specific), and `or-pro-se` (if the declarant is pro se).

ID: us.litigation.or-draft-declaration Version: 0.1.0 License: MIT Author: codearranger Language: en Added: 2026-06-01
⬇ Download

Draft an Oregon Declaration

Scaffold a new declaration that complies with UTCR 2.010 and ORCP 1 E. The declaration should be ready to fill in, sign, and file in support of a motion or other filing.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. This skill scaffolds a court document as a drafting aid. The user — not the skill — is the declarant, chooses what facts to swear to, and signs the declaration. Verify every rule, deadline, and citation against current law before filing. Pair with substantive review by counsel where stakes warrant.

What this skill produces

A declaration with:

  1. Caption (court header, parties, case number, document title: "DECLARATION OF [NAME] IN SUPPORT OF [MOTION TITLE]")
  2. Salutation: "I, [Full Name], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Oregon that the following is true and correct:"
  3. Numbered paragraphs of substantive content
  4. Verification clause (ORCP 1 E form): "I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Oregon that the foregoing is true and correct."
  5. Date and place of execution ("DATED this ... Executed at [city], Oregon")
  6. Signature block
  7. Exhibit List (if exhibits)
  8. Exhibit cover pages

Inputs to ask the user

  • Caption: court / county / parties / case number
  • Declarant name and role: who is signing? (party, witness, expert, etc.)
  • Supporting motion: what motion does this declaration support? (the document title incorporates this)
  • Personal-knowledge facts: what facts is the declarant swearing to?
  • Exhibits: list of documents that go with the declaration

Anatomy of a declaration

Salutation (top of body)

I, John Doe, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the State of Oregon that the following is true and
correct:

This is the ORCP 1 E form. Some practitioners prefer the shorter:

I, John Doe, hereby declare under penalty of perjury the
following:

Either is acceptable. The ORCP 1 E form is cleaner.

Numbered paragraphs

Each paragraph contains one factual point. Number with bold Arabic numerals followed by a period and tab:

1.  Identity. I am the Defendant in the above-captioned
    action. I am 42 years old, an Oregon resident, and I make
    this Declaration in support of Defendant's Motion to
    Compel under ORCP 46 A.

2.  Personal knowledge. The facts stated in this Declaration
    are based on my personal knowledge, except where I
    explicitly state otherwise.

3.  Service of First Requests for Production. On April 1,
    2025, I served First Requests for Production Nos. 1–6 on
    Plaintiff's counsel via File and Serve. A true and
    correct copy of the Requests is attached as Exhibit 1.

4.  Plaintiff's Responses. On May 1, 2025, I received
    Plaintiff's Responses via File and Serve. Plaintiff
    objected on grounds of "relevance, burden, and
    possession" and did not produce documents responsive to
    Requests Nos. 3, 5, and 6. A true and correct copy of
    Plaintiff's Responses is attached as Exhibit 2.

5.  Meet-and-confer letter. On May 10, 2025, I sent
    Plaintiff's counsel a meet-and-confer letter identifying
    the objections and requesting supplementation. A true
    and correct copy is attached as Exhibit 3.

6.  Phone conference. On May 14, 2025, I spoke with
    Plaintiff's counsel by phone for approximately 30
    minutes. I memorialized the call by email the same day;
    a true and correct copy of that email is attached as
    Exhibit 4.

7.  Plaintiff's position. As of the date of this Declaration,
    Plaintiff has not supplemented as to Requests Nos. 3, 5,
    and 6. Plaintiff maintains its objections.

8.  Damages from non-production. Without these documents, I
    cannot evaluate whether Plaintiff has standing to bring
    this action.

Verification clause (end of body, before signature)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of Oregon that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date and place

DATED this ____ day of ___________, 20__.

Executed at Portland, Oregon.

If executed outside Oregon, change to:

Executed at [City, State].

(28 USC § 1746 form requires identifying the state.)

Signature block

______________________________________
JOHN DOE
Defendant, pro se
[Address]
[Phone]
[Email]

ORCP 1 E — declarations in lieu of affidavits

ORCP 1 E: A "declaration under penalty of perjury" in the prescribed form may be used in lieu of a notarized affidavit. The acceptable form:

"I hereby declare that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that I understand it is made for use as evidence in court and is subject to penalty for perjury."

OR the shorter:

"I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Oregon that the foregoing is true and correct."

Either form is accepted statewide. Most pro se filers use the shorter form.

OEC 602 — Personal knowledge

Under OEC 602, the declarant must have personal knowledge of every stated fact, OR must specify the basis for belief.

If the declarant is testifying about facts they did not personally observe, say so:

9.  Reliance on records. The amounts and dates in
    paragraphs 3–6 are derived from my review of [source —
    bank statements, invoices, etc.]. I personally
    reviewed these records on [date]; true and correct
    copies are attached as Exhibits 5 and 6.

A declaration that includes facts beyond the declarant's personal knowledge, without specifying the basis, is subject to objection under OEC 602 and may be struck on motion under ORCP 47 D (for SJ practice) or its analog.

Exhibits

For declarations with exhibits, follow these conventions:

  • Number them (Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, ...) — Oregon convention
  • Reference each exhibit by number in the paragraph introducing it
  • Authenticate each exhibit: "A true and correct copy is attached as Exhibit [N]"
  • List all exhibits on an Exhibit List page after the signature block
  • Each exhibit gets a cover page ("EXHIBIT [N]" centered, with a short italic caption)

See or-statewide-format/references/exhibit-handling.md for the full exhibit-handling guide.

Declarations vs. motions — drawing the line

Declarations contain sworn facts. Motions contain argument.

A common mistake: putting argument in the declaration.

❌ Wrong (in the declaration):

Plaintiff is clearly a debt buyer that doesn't have proper chain of title and is trying to mislead the Court.

This is argument. It belongs in the motion, not the declaration.

✅ Right (in the declaration):

  1. Plaintiff's status. Based on my review of the public filings of [Plaintiff entity name] with the Oregon Secretary of State (Exhibit 5), Plaintiff is a debt-buying entity that purchases charged-off accounts. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges it "acquired" my account through an "assignment" but has not produced any document evidencing that assignment in response to Requests for Production.

The facts are sworn; the characterization ("clearly trying to mislead") is omitted. The motion can argue the characterization based on these facts.

Declarations and the OEC 803(6) business-records pattern

For declarations supporting business records under OEC 803(6) (the analog to FRE 803(6)), the declarant should be a "custodian or other qualified witness" attesting to:

  1. The record was made at or near the time of the events
  2. The record was made by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge
  3. The record was kept in the course of regularly conducted business activity
  4. It was the regular practice of the business to make such records

This is the foundation pattern for OEC 902(11) certified business records.

For a debt-buyer plaintiff's declaration attempting to authenticate the original creditor's records, the declaration typically fails because the declarant is the debt buyer's custodian, not the original creditor's. See or-consumer-debt/ references/evidence-debt-buyer.md for the foundational challenges.

Layered composition

This skill ALWAYS composes with:

  • or-statewide-format — caption, format, signature block, exhibits

It typically composes with:

  • or-pro-se — for pro se declarants
  • or-draft-motion — the declaration usually accompanies a motion
  • or-multcc / or-wccc / or-county-courts — the court header reflects the venue

Quality checks

Before filing:

  • or-quality-check — format pass
  • or-fact-check — verifies that the declaration's facts are consistent with the motion and any exhibits

Common pitfalls

Pitfall Consequence
Missing the perjury clause Declaration is invalid; may need to re-execute
Argument mixed in with facts Subject to objection; weakens both motion and decl
Facts beyond personal knowledge without basis OEC 602 objection
Wrong jurisdiction in salutation ("California" / "Washington") Invalid form
Lettered exhibits (A, B, C) Wrong convention for Oregon
Static date in the body Use fill-in blanks for handwritten date
No exhibit list Disorganized record; judge can't navigate

Cross-references

  • or-statewide-format/references/templates/declaration.md — full template
  • or-statewide-format/references/exhibit-handling.md — exhibit conventions
  • or-pro-se/references/pro-se-drafting-framework.md — drafting principles
  • or-draft-motion — companion motion
  • or-law-references/references/evidence-rules.md — OEC references

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · litigation

Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Abstract of Judgment

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Brief

Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Coalition Management

Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…

CaseMark