Marketplace Create skill Sign in

Post-Hearing Order Submission in New York

Use after a hearing or motion decision when the prevailing party needs to submit a proposed order for signature. Triggers include 'NY post-hearing order submission', 'settle order on notice', '22 NYCRR § 202.48 60-day rule', 'submit a proposed order to chambers in NY', 'counter- order', 'serve a settle-order packet', 'NY order on submission', 'how do I get the Justice to sign my order', 'transmittal letter to chambers'. Implements the 22 NYCRR § 202.48 settle-order procedure with the 60-day clock plus the 10-day notice + 5-day counter-order window. Handles the chambers transmittal letter and the post-signature NYSCEF Notice of Entry.

ID: 194c7617-8b18-4425-acf0-a8de1b3dc881 Version: 0.1.0 License: MIT Author: codearranger Language: en Added: 2026-06-15
⬇ Download

Post-Hearing Order Submission in New York

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. The 60-day settle-order clock is jurisdictional in many courts. Missing it forfeits the right to settle the order.

When this skill applies

After the Justice rules on a motion, one of three things happens:

  1. Short-form Decision and Order — the Justice writes the decision on the proposed order itself; no further submission needed. The order is filed by chambers via NYSCEF.
  2. Decision directs settle order — "Settle order on notice" or "Settle order on submission"; the prevailing party must submit a proposed order within 60 days.
  3. Decision is self-executing — no order needed (rare).

This skill covers #2: the settle-order procedure.

The 22 NYCRR § 202.48 framework

Day 0:    Justice issues Decision directing settle order
Day 0–60: Prevailing party drafts proposed order
Day X:    Prevailing party serves proposed order on opposing
          party (≥10 days before submission)
Day X+5:  Opposing party may serve a counter-order
Day X+10: Prevailing party submits proposed order to chambers,
          attaching counter-order (if served) and a cover
          letter discussing differences
Day ≤60:  Prevailing party submits to chambers; missing this
          deadline is fatal absent extension

On notice v. on submission

Direction Procedure
"Settle order on notice" Serve proposed order on opposing party 10 days before submission; opposing may serve counter-order within 5 days
"Settle order on submission" Submit proposed order to chambers without separate service (NYSCEF service of the filing is sufficient)

Proposed-order content

The proposed order should track the Justice's decision exactly:

  • Use the decision's exact language for the relief granted
  • Do not add relief not granted in the decision
  • Do not omit relief granted in the decision
  • Use the decretal "ORDERED that..." format

See ny-draft-order for the proposed-order template.

Chambers transmittal letter

When submitting on notice (or on submission), include a cover letter:

[Date]

Hon. [Justice Name], J.S.C.
Supreme Court, [County]
[Courthouse Address]

Re: [Caption], Index No. [#####/YYYY]
    Submission of Proposed Order

Dear Justice [Name]:

Enclosed for the Court's signature is a proposed Decision
and Order in the above-captioned matter, submitted on
notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 202.48 and the Court's
Decision dated [DATE]. The proposed order tracks the
Court's directives in [GRANTING / DENYING] Defendant's
motion under CPLR [SECTION].

[If on notice and opposing served a counter-order:]
A copy of the proposed order was served on Plaintiff's
counsel on [DATE] (attached as Exhibit 1). Plaintiff's
counsel served a counter-order on [DATE] (attached as
Exhibit 2). The principal difference between the two
proposed orders is [DESCRIBE]. The undersigned
respectfully submits that this Court's proposed order
should be entered because [REASON].

Respectfully submitted,

[Print Name]
Self-Represented Defendant
[Phone, email]

Counter-order procedure

If the opposing party served a counter-order:

  1. Review both proposed orders side by side
  2. Identify differences — language, scope, conditions
  3. Submit both to chambers with a cover letter discussing the differences
  4. Chambers selects (or modifies) one of the proposed orders and enters it

Post-signature: Notice of Entry

After the Justice signs and the order is entered (filed on NYSCEF by the clerk):

  1. NYSCEF notifies all parties automatically
  2. Prevailing party files a Notice of Entry (CPLR 5513(a)) — triggers the 30-day appeal clock
  3. Notice of Entry:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF [COUNTY]
----------------------------------------- X
[CAPTION]                                  Index No. [#####/YYYY]
                                           Hon. [JUSTICE]
                          [Plaintiff(s),]
                                           NOTICE OF ENTRY
            -against-
                          [Defendant(s).]
----------------------------------------- X

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the annexed is a true copy of the
Decision and Order of the Hon. [Justice], dated [DATE], and
filed and entered in the Office of the Clerk of the Court
on [DATE].

Dated: [...]
[Signature]

Filed via NYSCEF as document type "Notice of Entry."

Common errors

Error Consequence
Missing 60-day deadline Right to settle order deemed abandoned (CPLR analog — Funk v. Barry, 89 NY2d 364)
Submitting order that goes beyond the decision Justice rejects or modifies
Failing to serve 10 days before submission (on notice) Justice may refuse to sign
Submitting without cover letter discussing counter-order differences Justice can sign either; favorable side often loses
Failing to file Notice of Entry 30-day appeal clock may run anyway upon NYSCEF entry

Composition with other ny- skills

  • ny-draft-order — proposed-order content
  • ny-hearings — post-hearing follow-up
  • ny-deadlines — 60-day clock + appeal clock
  • ny-fact-check — pre-submission QC

Comments

Loading…

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · litigation

Writ of Execution

Drafts writs of execution and supporting levy instructions for post-judgment enforcement of money judgments. Covers application for writ, interest ca…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Deposition Witness Preparation

Runs ethics-compliant deposition witness-prep workflows for US civil litigation. Use when preparing party, fact, expert, or 30(b)(6) witnesses for de…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Witness Preparation Ethics Boundaries

Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Deposition Witness Preparation

Guides attorneys through deposition witness preparation using a two-session model with document review, practice examination, and day-of logistics. C…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Spokane County Superior Court — Venue Skill

Use when handling a Spokane County, Washington Superior Court case — civil practice at the **Spokane County Courthouse** (1116 West Broadway Avenue, …

codearranger