Marketplace Pricing Download

Motion to Dismiss

Drafts FRCP 12(b) motions to dismiss for commercial litigation. Triggers on requests to draft motions to dismiss, 12(b)(6) motions, jurisdictional challenges, venue motions, or pre-answer dispositive motions during the pleadings phase.

ID: us.litigation.motion-to-dismiss Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: CaseMark Language: en Added: 2026-05-27
⬇ Download

Motion to Dismiss

Draft a Rule 12(b) motion attacking the legal sufficiency of a complaint or the court's authority, structured for filing.

Prerequisites

Collect before drafting:

  1. Complaint — full text, all counts identified
  2. Jurisdiction — federal/state, division, local rules, page/formatting limits
  3. Case info — court name, docket number, party names as captioned
  4. Grounds — which 12(b) subsection(s) apply
  5. Referenced documents — contracts or public records central to the complaint

Drafting Workflow

Step 1: Caption

Format per local rules. Include court (full name, division, location), parties (as captioned), docket number, and title: "Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(__)."

Step 2: Introduction

  • Identify the moving party and specific 12(b) ground(s)
  • State whether seeking dismissal of entire complaint or specific counts
  • Provide a one-paragraph argument roadmap

12(b) grounds reference:

Rule Ground
12(b)(1) Lack of subject matter jurisdiction
12(b)(2) Lack of personal jurisdiction
12(b)(3) Improper venue
12(b)(4) Insufficient process
12(b)(5) Insufficient service of process
12(b)(6) Failure to state a claim
12(b)(7) Failure to join a required party

Step 3: Statement of Facts

  • Recite complaint facts — neutral tone, strategic emphasis
  • For 12(b)(6): confine to the four corners plus documents incorporated by reference, public records, and documents central to plaintiff's claim
  • Highlight gaps, conclusory allegations, and omissions
  • Organize chronologically or thematically to expose deficiencies
  • No argumentative characterization

Step 4: Legal Standard

Tailor to the ground(s) asserted:

  • 12(b)(6): Plausibility standard under Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Accept factual allegations as true; strip legal conclusions, then assess plausibility of remaining content.
  • 12(b)(1): Distinguish facial vs. factual attack. Plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction.
  • 12(b)(2): Analyze under forum state long-arm statute + due process. Distinguish specific vs. general jurisdiction per Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014).

Step 5: Argument

Use Roman-numeral or lettered headings, one per ground or deficient element. For each:

  • Quote the complaint's specific deficient allegations
  • Identify the legal element not plausibly pled
  • Cite controlling circuit/state authority with analogous dismissals
  • Distinguish anticipated contrary authority
  • For element-based claims: track each element systematically

Step 6: Conclusion & Prayer for Relief

Synthesize without repeating arguments. Specify relief:

Relief When appropriate
With prejudice Amendment would be futile
Without prejudice Curable pleading defects
More definite statement (12(e)) Complaint too vague to respond to (alternative)

Include request for costs/fees if statute authorizes, plus "any other relief the Court deems just and proper."

Step 7: Signature Block & Certificate of Service

  • Signature: Attorney name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email. Pro se: name, address, "Pro Se."
  • Certificate: Service method (CM/ECF, email, mail), date, all parties served. Account for FRCP 6(d) (+3 days for mail).

Pitfalls & Checks

  • 12(b)(6) constraint: Never rely on facts outside complaint, incorporated documents, or public records
  • Formatting: Verify local rules for font, margins, spacing, page limits before finalizing
  • Citations: Bluebook format; verify every case citation is current
  • Strategy: Lead with strongest ground; jurisdictional arguments precede merits
  • TOC/TOA: Required by some local rules or when motion exceeds 10 pages
  • E-filing: Ensure text-searchable PDF with bookmarks if court requires

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · litigation

Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Abstract of Judgment

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Brief

Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Coalition Management

Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…

CaseMark