Motion to Dismiss
Drafts FRCP 12(b) motions to dismiss for commercial litigation. Triggers on requests to draft motions to dismiss, 12(b)(6) motions, jurisdictional challenges, venue motions, or pre-answer dispositive motions during the pleadings phase.
Motion to Dismiss
Draft a Rule 12(b) motion attacking the legal sufficiency of a complaint or the court's authority, structured for filing.
Prerequisites
Collect before drafting:
- Complaint — full text, all counts identified
- Jurisdiction — federal/state, division, local rules, page/formatting limits
- Case info — court name, docket number, party names as captioned
- Grounds — which 12(b) subsection(s) apply
- Referenced documents — contracts or public records central to the complaint
Drafting Workflow
Step 1: Caption
Format per local rules. Include court (full name, division, location), parties (as captioned), docket number, and title: "Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(__)."
Step 2: Introduction
- Identify the moving party and specific 12(b) ground(s)
- State whether seeking dismissal of entire complaint or specific counts
- Provide a one-paragraph argument roadmap
12(b) grounds reference:
| Rule | Ground |
|---|---|
| 12(b)(1) | Lack of subject matter jurisdiction |
| 12(b)(2) | Lack of personal jurisdiction |
| 12(b)(3) | Improper venue |
| 12(b)(4) | Insufficient process |
| 12(b)(5) | Insufficient service of process |
| 12(b)(6) | Failure to state a claim |
| 12(b)(7) | Failure to join a required party |
Step 3: Statement of Facts
- Recite complaint facts — neutral tone, strategic emphasis
- For 12(b)(6): confine to the four corners plus documents incorporated by reference, public records, and documents central to plaintiff's claim
- Highlight gaps, conclusory allegations, and omissions
- Organize chronologically or thematically to expose deficiencies
- No argumentative characterization
Step 4: Legal Standard
Tailor to the ground(s) asserted:
- 12(b)(6): Plausibility standard under Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Accept factual allegations as true; strip legal conclusions, then assess plausibility of remaining content.
- 12(b)(1): Distinguish facial vs. factual attack. Plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction.
- 12(b)(2): Analyze under forum state long-arm statute + due process. Distinguish specific vs. general jurisdiction per Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014).
Step 5: Argument
Use Roman-numeral or lettered headings, one per ground or deficient element. For each:
- Quote the complaint's specific deficient allegations
- Identify the legal element not plausibly pled
- Cite controlling circuit/state authority with analogous dismissals
- Distinguish anticipated contrary authority
- For element-based claims: track each element systematically
Step 6: Conclusion & Prayer for Relief
Synthesize without repeating arguments. Specify relief:
| Relief | When appropriate |
|---|---|
| With prejudice | Amendment would be futile |
| Without prejudice | Curable pleading defects |
| More definite statement (12(e)) | Complaint too vague to respond to (alternative) |
Include request for costs/fees if statute authorizes, plus "any other relief the Court deems just and proper."
Step 7: Signature Block & Certificate of Service
- Signature: Attorney name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email. Pro se: name, address, "Pro Se."
- Certificate: Service method (CM/ECF, email, mail), date, all parties served. Account for FRCP 6(d) (+3 days for mail).
Pitfalls & Checks
- 12(b)(6) constraint: Never rely on facts outside complaint, incorporated documents, or public records
- Formatting: Verify local rules for font, margins, spacing, page limits before finalizing
- Citations: Bluebook format; verify every case citation is current
- Strategy: Lead with strongest ground; jurisdictional arguments precede merits
- TOC/TOA: Required by some local rules or when motion exceeds 10 pages
- E-filing: Ensure text-searchable PDF with bookmarks if court requires
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Writ of Execution
Drafts writs of execution and supporting levy instructions for post-judgment enforcement of money judgments. Covers application for writ, interest ca…
Deposition Witness Preparation
Runs ethics-compliant deposition witness-prep workflows for US civil litigation. Use when preparing party, fact, expert, or 30(b)(6) witnesses for de…
Witness Preparation Ethics Boundaries
Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible…
Deposition Witness Preparation
Guides attorneys through deposition witness preparation using a two-session model with document review, practice examination, and day-of logistics. C…
Spokane County Superior Court — Venue Skill
Use when handling a Spokane County, Washington Superior Court case — civil practice at the **Spokane County Courthouse** (1116 West Broadway Avenue, …
Comments
Loading…