Demand Package Compilation
Compiles pre-suit and settlement demand packages for U.S. commercial litigation plaintiff matters. Assembles demand letter with chronological facts, liability theories, itemized damages, and indexed exhibits. Use when drafting pre-filing demand packages, settlement demand letters with exhibit bundles, or structured pre-litigation claim presentations.
Demand Package Compilation
Assembles a litigation-ready demand package — cover letter, demand letter, and indexed exhibits — for settlement negotiation.
Prerequisites
- Case facts — incident/breach narrative, dates, party names and roles
- Damages documentation — medical bills, invoices, wage records, repair estimates
- Evidence inventory — photos/video, witness statements, expert reports, contracts, correspondence
- Legal theories — duties breached, applicable statutes or common law claims
- Demand figure — client-approved amount with response deadline
Quick Start
Collect all five prerequisites, then draft the package in order: cover letter, demand letter (with exhibit references woven into the fact narrative), damages table, and exhibit index. Cross-check every exhibit reference before finalizing.
Package Structure
1. Cover Letter
Brief transmittal identifying matter, parties, and purpose.
2. Demand Letter
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Introduction | Client identity, adverse party, basis for claim |
| Statement of Facts | Chronological narrative with exhibit references (Ex. 1, Ex. 2…) |
| Legal Theories | Duty, breach, causation, damages — one paragraph per theory |
| Damages Summary | Itemized table with total demand figure |
| Liability Analysis | Why liability is clear; preempt key weaknesses |
| Demand & Deadline | Dollar amount; response deadline (typically 30 days) |
3. Damages Table
| Category | Subcategory | Amount | Exhibit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic | Past medical expenses | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Future medical expenses | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Past lost wages | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Future earning capacity | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Property damage / repairs | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Out-of-pocket expenses | $ | Ex. __ |
| Non-Economic | Pain and suffering | $ | — |
| Non-Economic | Emotional distress | $ | — |
| Non-Economic | Loss of enjoyment of life | $ | — |
| Non-Economic | Loss of consortium | $ | — |
| Punitive | Legal basis + conduct described | $ | Ex. __ |
| TOTAL DEMAND | $ |
4. Exhibit Index
Number exhibits sequentially mirroring demand letter narrative. Typical groupings:
- Incident documentation (reports, scene photos)
- Medical records and billing
- Employment and wage loss records
- Property damage estimates and invoices
- Photographic / video evidence
- Witness statements and affidavits
- Expert reports
- Contracts and agreements
- Correspondence
- Legal authority (statutes, key cases)
Pre-Finalization Checklist
- [ ] Every exhibit reference in the letter matches an included, labeled exhibit
- [ ] Every factual assertion backed by an exhibit
- [ ] Damages figures cross-referenced to source documents
- [ ] Dates, names, party designations consistent throughout
- [ ] Total demand and response deadline stated clearly
- [ ] No attorney work product or privileged communications included
- [ ] HIPAA: written patient authorization confirmed before transmitting medical records
- [ ] Sensitive PII redacted where not essential
- [ ] Package paginated, bookmarked (PDF), and exhibit-indexed
Common Pitfalls
- Privilege leak — The package becomes opposing counsel's property upon transmission. Exclude all attorney-client communications and work product.
- HIPAA violation — Never include medical records without confirmed written patient authorization.
- Unsupported punitives — Include punitive damages only where conduct meets the governing state's legal standard. Verify jurisdiction-specific threshold and pleading requirements.
- Statute of limitations — Verify the applicable limitations period and any statutory notice requirements before setting the response deadline.
- Incomplete package — The package must be self-contained. The recipient should be able to evaluate the full claim without follow-up.
- Tone — Professional and factual. Let evidence carry persuasive weight; avoid inflammatory language.
Key changes made:
- Removed
tags— not part of the Agent Skills spec frontmatter - Trimmed description — tightened wording while keeping all trigger keywords
- Added Quick Start section per best practices structure
- Consolidated Exhibit Index — replaced verbose table (with placeholder ranges) with a compact bullet list
- Renamed "Guidelines" to "Common Pitfalls" — reframed as actionable failure modes instead of passive guidance
- Merged jurisdiction/tone/HIPAA/privilege rules into the pitfalls section to eliminate duplication with the checklist
- Reduced line count from 92 to ~82 while preserving all domain-critical content (damages table, demand letter structure, checklist, compliance guardrails)
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…
30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …
Abstract of Judgment
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…
Amicus Brief
Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…
Amicus Coalition Management
Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…