Counterclaim & Crossclaim
Drafts court-ready counterclaims and crossclaims for commercial litigation. Analyzes case documents, classifies compulsory vs. permissive counterclaims, ensures procedural compliance with federal/state rules, and structures causes of action with proper element pleading. Use when a defendant must assert affirmative claims against the plaintiff or crossclaims against co-defendants during pleadings.
Counterclaim & Crossclaim
Drafts counterclaim and/or crossclaim pleadings asserting a defendant's affirmative claims against the plaintiff or co-defendants, satisfying procedural and substantive pleading requirements.
Prerequisites
- Original complaint — full text with caption, case number, court, filing date
- Case documents — contracts, correspondence, invoices, emails, evidence
- Party information — names, roles, addresses, relationships (including co-defendants for crossclaims)
- Jurisdictional details — court, rules of civil procedure, local rules, formatting requirements
- Legal authority — statutes, regulations, case law for each cause of action
Quick Start
- Extract case identifiers and build a chronological fact timeline from provided documents
- Classify each potential claim as compulsory or permissive (FRCP 13(a)/(b) or state equivalent)
- Run the procedural compliance checklist below
- Assemble the pleading using the document structure
- Verify all element requirements per the cause of action table
Workflow
Step 1: Document Review & Fact Extraction
| Task | Details |
|---|---|
| Extract identifiers | Court, caption, case number, party designations |
| Build timeline | Formation → performance → breach → damages → plaintiff's wrongful conduct |
| Identify counterclaim targets | Same transaction/occurrence (compulsory) or related matters (permissive) |
| Identify crossclaim targets | Co-defendants liable under contribution, indemnification, or independent theories |
| Catalog damages | Specific amounts, dates, causation chain, continuing damages |
Step 2: Procedural Compliance
- [ ] Compulsory vs. permissive status (FRCP 13(a)/(b) or state equivalent)
- [ ] Crossclaim from same transaction/occurrence (FRCP 13(g) or state equivalent)
- [ ] Statute of limitations for each cause of action
- [ ] Jurisdictional basis: supplemental for counterclaims; independent or supplemental for crossclaims
- [ ] Local rules: caption format, margins, font, spacing, page limits, e-filing
- [ ] Verification requirement (party vs. attorney)
- [ ] Heightened pleading (FRCP 9(b) for fraud: who, what, when, where, how)
Step 3: Document Assembly
Structure the pleading with these sections in order:
Caption — Mirror original complaint; add Counterclaimant/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Cross-Defendant designations; title "COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSSCLAIM" (or separate documents per local rules)
Introductory Statement — Filing party, capacity, authorizing rule (FRCP 13/state equivalent), compulsory/permissive nature; for crossclaims: co-defendant targets and legal basis
Jurisdictional Allegations — Subject matter jurisdiction, supplemental jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1367) [VERIFY], amount in controversy, venue
Parties — Full identification with transaction roles; crossclaim defendants: describe liability-creating relationship
Factual Allegations (numbered paragraphs) — Incorporate admissions from complaint by reference; deny/qualify inaccurate allegations; present new facts chronologically; allege damages with specificity (nature, timing, causation, amount)
Causes of Action (separately numbered counts) — Format: "COUNT [N]: [Legal Theory] ([Counterclaim/Crossclaim] Against [Party])". Each count: incorporate factual paragraphs by reference, satisfy each element, cite controlling authority, include theory-specific allegations (fault percentage for contribution, indemnification clause for contractual indemnity)
Prayer for Relief — Compensatory damages, punitive damages (if authorized), injunctive/declaratory relief, attorney's fees (cite basis), pre/post-judgment interest, catch-all clause; separate subsections for counterclaim vs. crossclaim relief
Verification (if required) — Party declaration under penalty of perjury
Signature Block — Attorney name, bar number, firm, contact; "Attorney for Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant [Name]"
Certificate of Service — All parties/counsel, addresses, method, date
Cause of Action Elements
| Claim | Required Elements |
|---|---|
| Breach of Contract | Formation → terms → performance → breach → causation → damages |
| Fraud | False statement → materiality → scienter → reliance → causation → damages (plead with particularity) |
| Contribution | Common liability → proportionate fault → right to apportion |
| Contractual Indemnity | Indemnification clause → triggering event → covered claims → notice |
| Common Law Indemnity | Special relationship → passive vs. active fault → right to shift liability |
| Unjust Enrichment | Benefit conferred → knowledge → inequity of retention |
Pitfalls & Checks
- Compulsory counterclaim waiver: Failure to assert a compulsory counterclaim typically results in waiver — flag all potentially compulsory claims
- Alternative pleading: Permitted under FRCP 8(d)(2); label "in the alternative" without conceding primary theory
- Relation back: Counterclaims generally relate back to the original filing date for limitations, but verify jurisdiction-specific rules
- Consistency: Party names, dates, amounts, and contract references must match source documents exactly
- Cross-references: Verify all internal paragraph and exhibit references; ensure exhibit labels match text
- All citations must be verified — mark uncertain citations with
[VERIFY] - Do not fabricate facts — plead only from provided case documents
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…
30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition
Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …
Abstract of Judgment
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…
Amicus Brief
Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…
Amicus Coalition Management
Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…