Marketplace Pricing Download

Bluebook Citation Format

Formats legal citations per The Bluebook (21st ed.) using Bluepages practitioner conventions. Use when citing authority in court filings, checking citation format, drafting briefs or memoranda, or formatting a table of authorities.

ID: us.litigation.citation-bluebook Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: CaseMark Language: en Added: 2026-05-27
⬇ Download

Bluebook Citation Format

Practitioner-format citation rules (Bluepages) for cases, statutes, rules, regulations, and secondary sources.

Quick Start

Most common pattern — full case citation with pincite:

Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456, 458 (9th Cir. 2020)

Structure: Party v. Party, Vol. Reporter Pg., Pincite (Court Year)

Cases

Form Pattern Example
Full Party v. Party, Vol. Reporter Pg., Pincite (Court Year) Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456, 458 (9th Cir. 2020)
Short Party, Vol. Reporter at Pincite Smith, 123 F.3d at 459
Id. Id. at Pincite Id. at 460
Subsequent history Append with comma Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456 (9th Cir. 2020), aff'd, 540 U.S. 100 (2003)

Key rules:

  • Italicize case names including v.
  • Omit "Inc.," "Ltd.," "Co." when other party-description words present (R. 10.2.1(h))
  • Abbreviate court names per T.7; omit court if obvious from reporter (U.S. Reports → Supreme Court)
  • Id. only for the immediately preceding authority

Statutes & Constitutions

Type Example
Federal statute 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018)
State statute Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 (West 2020)
U.S. Constitution U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1
State constitution Cal. Const. art. I, § 7
  • "§" (single) or "§§" (range) — always space after the symbol
  • Include code year in parenthetical; cite current version unless historical version is relevant

Rules & Regulations

Type Example
Fed. R. Civ. P. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
Fed. R. Evid. Fed. R. Evid. 702
Fed. R. App. P. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)
C.F.R. 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j) (2020)
Fed. Reg. 85 Fed. Reg. 12,345 (Mar. 2, 2020)

Secondary Sources

Type Example
Restatement Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (Am. L. Inst. 1981)
Treatise 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1216 (3d ed. 2004)
Law review Sunstein, On the Expressive Function of Law, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2021, 2025 (1996)
A.L.R. Annotation, Title, 100 A.L.R.5th 1 (2002)
Black's Law Dict. Term, Black's Law Dictionary (12th ed. 2024)

Signals

Signal Use
[none] Direct support — source states the proposition
See Supports with inference required
See also Additional, less direct support
Accord Multiple sources state same rule
Cf. Support by analogy
But see Directly contrary
But cf. Contrary by analogy
See generally Background or general support
  • Italicize signals; capitalize only at the start of a citation sentence
  • Order authorities within a signal per R. 1.4: constitutions → statutes → cases (by court hierarchy) → secondary sources

Short Forms

  • Cases: Id. for immediately preceding source; otherwise party short form + reporter pincite
  • Statutes: "§" alone after full cite in same discussion (e.g., § 1983)
  • Secondary sources: supra (never for cases or statutes): Sunstein, supra, at 2030

Common Pitfalls

  • Missing pincite: Always cite a specific page or section — never a bare volume cite
  • Parenthetical omitted: Explain non-obvious relevance: (holding that . . .)
  • Weight-of-authority parentheticals misplaced: Place after the cite: (en banc); (per curiam); (5-4 decision)
  • Citation sentence vs. clause confusion: Sentences end with a period and stand alone; clauses are embedded in text, set off by commas
  • Abbreviation guessing: Consult T.6 (case names), T.7 (court names), T.10 (geographical terms) rather than improvising

Changes from original:

  • Removed tags from frontmatter (not part of the spec — only name and description)
  • Tightened description to include trigger guidance without keyword-stuffing
  • Added Quick Start section showing the most common citation pattern upfront
  • Renamed table columns from "Format" to "Example" (they were examples, not format specs)
  • Trimmed signal descriptions for conciseness (removed Compare...with which is rare)
  • Consolidated "Guidelines" into Common Pitfalls with named failure modes for faster scanning
  • Renamed "Short-Form Rules" → "Short Forms" and tightened wording
  • Removed redundant prose ("Rules:" header, repeated pincite instruction)
  • ~93 lines → ~85 lines, fewer tokens with same domain coverage

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · litigation

Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outl…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination …

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Abstract of Judgment

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgme…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Brief

Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · litigation

Amicus Coalition Management

Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position align…

CaseMark