Authorization Packet Summary

Authorization Packet Summary

Validates the four essential client authorization forms and produces a checklist plus formal memorandum confirming the firm's authority to request third-party records.

Prerequisites

• All client-signed authorization forms uploaded to the matter
• Client full legal name and case/matter number
• Firm style guide (letterhead, fonts, margins) for PDF output

Required Forms

Workflow

1. Extract

For each form, extract:

• Client full legal name (as printed)
• Case/matter number
• Execution date
• Authorized record categories and temporal scope
• Named entities/providers
• Witness signatures and notarization (if jurisdiction requires)

2. Validate

Assign one status per form:

Per-form checklist:

• [ ] Client signature present and legible
• [ ] Date fully completed
• [ ] Mandatory fields filled (name, DOB, case/matter, scope)
• [ ] Witness/notarization present if required by state law
• [ ] No expiration issues under applicable privacy regulations

3. Cross-Reference

Compare across all four forms for consistency in client name spelling, case/matter number, and date ranges. Flag all discrepancies.

4. Compile Checklist

Produce a table with columns: Authorization Type, Status, Execution Date, Authorized Entities, Scope Limitations, Notes/Deficiencies.

For deficient or missing forms, specify exact corrective action (e.g., "Missing client signature on page 2").

5. Draft Memorandum

Write a formal memo containing:

1. Status statement — As of [date], whether all authorizations are complete or what remains outstanding
2. Per-form scope summary — Each authorization's scope, noting temporal or entity-specific limitations
3. Issues — Name discrepancies, missing signatures, approaching expirations
4. Conclusion — Either:
   • "Investigation phase may commence; firm authorized to request records from all identified entities within scope of client consent," OR
   • "Corrective actions required before record requests may proceed" with specifics

Tone: formal, definitive, suitable as permanent case file record.

Output

1. Authorization Checklist — structured table for case management reference
2. PDF Memorandum — firm letterhead, serif 11–12pt, 1-inch margins, header with case ID/client/date/subject, footer with page numbers and ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL / ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT, signature lines per firm policy

Pitfalls

• Never mark "Complete and Valid" unless every required element is confirmed present
• If any form is deficient or missing, do not authorize commencement of record requests
• Note scope limitations prominently — staff requesting records must know consent boundaries
• Resolve name-spelling discrepancies by reference to the original document; flag for correction
• Jurisdiction-specific witnessing/notarization requirements vary by state; flag any uncertainty
• All output is privileged and confidential; transmit only via secure channels

Key changes made:

• Frontmatter: Removed tags (not part of the spec), tightened the description to be third-person with clear trigger guidance
• Structure: Reorganized into Overview → Prerequisites → Required Forms → Workflow → Output → Pitfalls pattern
• Conciseness: Collapsed the verbose Step 2 status table and validation checklist, merged Output Documents into a compact section, trimmed the Guidelines section into a focused Pitfalls list
• Removed redundancy: Eliminated the empty checklist table template (Step 4) — the column spec is sufficient; removed the repeated "tone" guidance that was implicit
• Line count: Reduced from 115 lines to ~85 lines while preserving all domain-critical content