Marketplace Create skill Sign in

Legal Opinion Summary

Summarizes U.S. transactional legal opinions into executive-ready briefs preserving issues, analysis, conclusions, qualifications, and key authorities. Triggers when asked to summarize a legal opinion, opinion memorandum, legal analysis memo, or produce an executive opinion recap.

ID: 987070f8-9985-4c4e-8a9d-7e6f1fde5758 Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: CaseMark Language: en Added: 2026-06-15
⬇ Download

Legal Opinion Summary

Condense a full legal opinion into a professional summary that preserves substance and qualifications. Target 20–30% of original length unless instructed otherwise.

Quick Start

Before summarizing, confirm:

  • Full opinion text (including relied-upon exhibits/appendices)
  • Governing jurisdiction(s) and transaction context
  • Privilege/confidentiality marking requirements
  • Target audience and desired length

Required Sections

Section Content
Issues Presented Plain-language statement of each legal question; number if multiple
Factual Background Material facts only; omit narrative detail
Legal Analysis Per issue: controlling standard, key reasoning, decisive facts
Conclusion / Recommendation Outcome, recommendation, reliance conditions
Qualifications / Assumptions Material limits, open questions, reliance assumptions
Risk / Alternatives If addressed: risks, likelihoods, alternatives
Authorities Controlling statutes, regs, or cases; short cites only

Issue Analysis Table

For each issue, populate:

Issue Standard Key Facts Reasoning Conclusion

Compression Rules

  • Include every legal question and final conclusion.
  • Preserve all material qualifiers, uncertainties, and counterarguments.
  • Retain controlling statutory language or contract excerpts when central to analysis.
  • Remove string citations and non-controlling authorities.
  • Use short citations sufficient for lookup.

Pitfalls

  • Never introduce theories or arguments absent from the original opinion.
  • Never overstate certainty — mirror all caveats, limits, and contingencies exactly.
  • Preserve privilege/work-product sensitivity; apply required markings.
  • Mark uncertain citations with [VERIFY].
  • Maintain professional memorandum tone throughout.

Key changes: consolidated the description into a tighter trigger-focused sentence, removed the verbose template (the Required Sections table + Issue Analysis Table serve the same purpose more concisely), merged the guidelines into a "Pitfalls" section, eliminated the redundant "Compression Checklist" heading in favor of "Compression Rules", and cut ~30% of tokens while preserving all legal substance. Please grant write permission so I can save the file, or copy the content above directly.

Comments

Loading…

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · corporate

Action by Written Consent of Incorporator

Drafts a U.S. corporate Action by Written Consent of Incorporator for post-formation organizational actions (adopting bylaws, appointing directors, t…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting

Drafts U.S. corporate written-consent instruments (board, shareholder, member) as substitutes for formal meetings. Triggers when counsel requests boa…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting

Drafts Written Consents in Lieu of Meeting for corporate boards or shareholders. Ensures compliance with state corporate law (e.g., DGCL §§141(f), 22…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Shareholder Voting Agreement

Drafts enforceable shareholder Voting Agreements coordinating director elections, fundamental transactions, charter amendments, and other corporate m…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Transitional Services Agreement

Drafts a Transitional Services Agreement (TSA) for post-closing seller-to-buyer service delivery in U.S. M&A transactions. Use when a corporate acqui…

CaseMark