Marketplace Create skill Sign in

Letter of Intent (LOI)

Drafts U.S. corporate transaction Letters of Intent (LOI) for mergers, acquisitions, investments, and strategic alliances. Separates non-binding intent from enforceable obligations and defines deal structure, key economics, and closing path. Use when converting deal terms into a preliminary transaction document. Trigger keywords: "LOI", "letter of intent", "M&A LOI", "merger term sheet", "no-shop", "exclusivity", "deal letter".

ID: aae1f3db-9240-43bf-8c4f-5a983c01c96e Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: CaseMark Language: en Added: 2026-06-15
⬇ Download

Letter of Intent (LOI)

Drafts a transaction LOI that advances execution while preserving negotiating flexibility. Default posture: non-binding except explicitly designated provisions.

Prerequisites

  1. Party identities, entity forms, and governing jurisdictions.
  2. Transaction type and structure (asset sale, stock sale, merger, investment, JV, option).
  3. Agreed economics: price, payment schedule, earn-outs, escrows, caps.
  4. Timeline: signing target, exclusivity window, diligence period, closing date.
  5. Conditions precedent and responsibility allocation (regulatory, financing, consents).
  6. Binding vs non-binding designation for each term set.
  7. Known constraints: antitrust, sector regulations, board/lender approvals.

Output Structure / Process

Produce an audit-ready LOI in business-letter format using this sequence.

1) Intake Validation

  • [ ] Party names and addresses complete.
  • [ ] Transaction purpose stated in one unambiguous sentence.
  • [ ] Economic terms fully defined and internally consistent.
  • [ ] Timeline mapped to conditions precedent.
  • [ ] Definitive documents identified (SPA, merger agreement, ancillaries).
  • [ ] Binding clause set explicitly chosen by user.
  • [ ] Governing law and jurisdictional basis confirmed.

2) Clause Matrix

Section Required? Binding?
Date / Parties / Purpose Yes Non-binding
Transaction Overview Yes Non-binding
Principal Terms (price, structure, adjustments) Yes Non-binding unless stated
Conditions Precedent Yes Non-binding
Definitive Agreement Process Yes Mixed
Exclusivity / No-Shop Optional Usually binding
Confidentiality Optional/Yes Usually binding
Expenses / Costs Optional Usually binding
Liability Limitation / No-Action Optional Usually binding
Governing Law / Disputes Yes Binding
Signatures / Counterparts Yes Binding

3) Drafting Rules

  • Always include a plain-language binding-effect section with an enumerated list of binding carve-outs.
  • Include no-liability clause for failure to close and good-faith negotiation language for definitive agreements.
  • Keep conditions precedent objective, verifiable, and assigned to a responsible party.
  • Do not embed tax opinions; use a placeholder for tax allocations.
  • Definitive agreement controls if conflict with LOI.

4) Template Skeleton

[Date]
[Party A Name]
[Party B Name]

RE: Letter of Intent – Proposed [Transaction Type]

[Opening: parties + transaction purpose]

1. Transaction Overview
2. Transaction Structure
3. Principal Terms
4. Conditions Precedent
5. Binding Commitments (Confidentiality / Exclusivity / Costs / Governing Law)
6. Definitive Agreements and Timeline
7. Termination and Liability
8. Miscellaneous (integration, notices, counsel, no assignment)
9. Signature Blocks

5) Quality Gate

  • [ ] Defined terms consistent throughout (Transaction, Closing Date, Effective Date, CPs).
  • [ ] All amounts specify currency, basis, and payment schedule.
  • [ ] Non-compete references included only if jurisdictionally supportable and requested.
  • [ ] Public-company-sensitive language flagged with compliance review placeholder.

Guidelines

  • Use clean drafting style; avoid overcommitment language in non-binding portions.
  • Do not omit remedies for breach of expressly binding clauses.
  • If existing NDA is signed, state LOI is supplemental and preserve NDA hierarchy.
  • For regulated sectors, add counsel review notes on approvals and filing requirements.
  • For cross-border transactions, flag foreign-law and conflict-of-laws risk.
  • If anti-circumvention concern exists, add carve-outs and enforcement language for exclusivity.

Comments

Loading…

Related Skills

United States flagUnited States · corporate

Action by Written Consent of Incorporator

Drafts a U.S. corporate Action by Written Consent of Incorporator for post-formation organizational actions (adopting bylaws, appointing directors, t…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting

Drafts U.S. corporate written-consent instruments (board, shareholder, member) as substitutes for formal meetings. Triggers when counsel requests boa…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting

Drafts Written Consents in Lieu of Meeting for corporate boards or shareholders. Ensures compliance with state corporate law (e.g., DGCL §§141(f), 22…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Shareholder Voting Agreement

Drafts enforceable shareholder Voting Agreements coordinating director elections, fundamental transactions, charter amendments, and other corporate m…

CaseMark
United States flagUnited States · corporate

Transitional Services Agreement

Drafts a Transitional Services Agreement (TSA) for post-closing seller-to-buyer service delivery in U.S. M&A transactions. Use when a corporate acqui…

CaseMark