Marketplace Create skill Sign in

/customize

Guided customization of your privacy practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust risk posture, escalation contacts, DPA playbook, privacy policy commitments, PIA house style, DSAR process, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my playbook", or "customize".

ID: 15072d5c-cd6b-4fbd-a1cd-6e75d95f6351 Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: anthropics Language: en Added: 2026-06-15
⬇ Download

/customize

When this runs

The user typed /privacy-legal:customize. They want to change something in their privacy profile — a risk posture, an escalation contact, a DPA position, a PIA section, a DSAR timeline — without re-running the whole cold-start interview and without hand-editing YAML.

What to do

  1. Read the config. Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md (and ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md one level up). If the plugin config does not exist or still contains [PLACEHOLDER] values, say:

    You haven't run setup yet. Run /privacy-legal:cold-start-interview first — customize is for adjusting a profile you already have.

  2. Show the customizable map. List what's in the profile, grouped, with a one-line summary of the current value:

    • Company / who you are — name, industry, jurisdictions, stage, practice setting, controller vs. processor orientation (shared across all 12 plugins — changes flow through company-profile.md)
    • Risk posture — conservative / middle / aggressive, what each means for processor obligations, cross-border transfers, and retention
    • People — DPO, privacy team, engineering liaison, outside counsel, escalation chain
    • DPA playbook — positions on sub-processor notice, deletion, audit, liability, international transfers, SCCs — as processor and as controller
    • Privacy policy commitments — the commitments your privacy notice has made that /policy-monitor watches practice against
    • PIA house style — section order, risk scoring, stakeholder framing, when DPIA triggers apply
    • DSAR process — verification, statutory timelines per regime, exemption application, template response structure
    • Workflow — intake path, matter workspaces, policy-monitor sweep cadence
    • Integrations — document storage / privacy tool / Slack status, fallbacks
  3. Ask what they want to change.

    What would you like to adjust? Pick a section, or describe the change in your own words.

  4. Make the change. Show the current value, ask for the new value, explain what changes downstream, confirm, write it to the config.

    Examples:

    • Sub-processor notice 30 days → 14 days: "/dpa-review will now flag anything shorter than 14 days as a deviation. Existing DPAs stay as logged."
    • New DSAR exemption in the playbook: "/dsar-response will surface this exemption in the assessment step where the facts match."
    • Risk posture middle → conservative: "I'll flag more activities for PIA escalation, recommend stricter SCC clauses, and be more conservative on retention."
  5. For shared-profile changes (company name, industry, jurisdictions, practice setting, stage): write to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md and note:

    This change affects all 12 plugins — any plugin that reads your jurisdiction footprint now sees [new value].

  6. Close.

    Done. Your next output will reflect the change. Anything else? You can run /privacy-legal:customize anytime.

Guardrails

  • Never delete a section. If the user wants to "remove" a regime from scope, offer to mark it [Not currently in scope] and explain what flagging drops.
  • Flag internal inconsistency. If the change would make the profile inconsistent (e.g., "processor only" + controller playbook positions active; or "no EU nexus" + SCCs in the default template), flag the tension.
  • Flag guardrail degradation. The [review] flag, source attribution tags, [verify] tags on cited regulations, and the DPIA-trigger mandatory-check on /use-case-triage are load-bearing — do not remove. If statutory DSAR timelines are adjusted below the regulatory minimum, refuse and explain why.
  • One change at a time. Don't re-ask the whole interview.

Comments

Loading…

Related Skills

GENERAL · data-protection

Vendor Privacy Due Diligence

Pre-contract vendor privacy due diligence per GDPR Article 28(1). Covers risk questionnaires, technical controls assessment, certification review, da…

mukul975
GENERAL · data-protection

Vendor Privacy Audit

On-site and remote vendor audit procedures per GDPR Article 28(3)(h). Covers audit planning, evidence collection methodologies, finding classificatio…

mukul975
GENERAL · data-protection

vendor-ai-review-anthropics

Review vendor AI terms — agreement, addendum, or ToS AI provisions — against your governance positions; flag training-on-data, liability, model chang…

anthropics
GENERAL · data-protection

use-case-triage

Quickly determine whether a processing activity needs a PIA, a mandatory GDPR DPIA, or can proceed — surfaces privacy policy conflicts and routes to …

anthropics
GENERAL · data-protection

Implementing Transparent Communication

Implements GDPR Article 12 transparent information and communication requirements, covering concise, intelligible, and plain language obligations, re…

mukul975