Marketplace Pricing Download

claude-review

Agentic contract review using superdoc-redlines. Spawns parallel sub-agents for comprehensive document review with tracked changes.

ID: general.contracts.claude-review Version: 0.1.0 License: Apache-2.0 Author: yuch85 Language: en Added: 2026-06-01
⬇ Download

/claude-review

Agentic contract review skill that uses the superdoc-redlines library to review and amend legal documents with tracked changes. For large documents (>50K tokens), spawns parallel sub-agents for comprehensive coverage.

Usage

/claude-review [--single-agent|--multi-agent] <document> <instructions>

Arguments:

  • --single-agent (optional) - Force single-agent workflow regardless of document size
  • --multi-agent (optional) - Force multi-agent workflow regardless of document size
  • <document> - Path to the DOCX file to review
  • <instructions> - Review instructions (e.g., "Convert from UK to Singapore jurisdiction")

Examples:

/claude-review contract.docx Convert from UK to Singapore law
/claude-review --multi-agent contract.docx Convert from UK to Singapore law
/claude-review --single-agent large-contract.docx Review warranties only
/claude-review ./contracts/bta.docx Review warranties and update statutory references
/claude-review "Business Transfer Agreement.docx" Adapt for Singapore jurisdiction, update all UK statutes

How It Works

This skill reads $ARGUMENTS for the document path and instructions.

Argument Parsing

Parse arguments as follows:

  1. Check for optional workflow flags: --single-agent or --multi-agent (if present, remove from arguments)
  2. First remaining argument: document path (may be quoted if contains spaces)
  3. Remaining arguments: review instructions (joined as a single string)

If arguments are missing, prompt the user for:

  1. Document path
  2. Review instructions

Workflow Override:

  • If user specifies --single-agent or --multi-agent, that workflow MUST be used
  • User-specified workflow overrides any automatic selection based on document size
  • If no workflow flag is provided, use automatic selection based on document size

Workflow Selection

Priority 1 - User Override (if specified):

  • If user provides --single-agent flag: Use single-agent workflow
  • If user provides --multi-agent flag: Use multi-agent workflow

Priority 2 - Automatic Selection (if no flag): Based on document size, choose the appropriate workflow:

Document Size Workflow Reason
< 50K tokens Single-agent Direct review per CONTRACT-REVIEW-SKILL.md
>= 50K tokens Multi-agent Orchestrator + sub-agents per CONTRACT-REVIEW-AGENTIC-SKILL.md

CRITICAL: User-specified workflow flags override automatic selection.

Step-by-Step Procedure

Step 1: Validate Document

cd /home/tyc/ross-ide-contract/superdoc-redlines
node superdoc-redline.mjs read --input "<document>" --stats-only

Verify the document exists and get statistics:

  • blockCount - Number of blocks
  • estimatedTokens - Token estimate
  • recommendedChunks - Suggested chunk count

Step 2: Extract Document Structure

node superdoc-redline.mjs extract --input "<document>" --output "<document>-ir.json"

This creates the block ID mapping needed for edits.

Step 3: Choose Workflow

CRITICAL: If user specified --single-agent or --multi-agent flag, use that workflow regardless of document size.

Otherwise, use automatic selection:

If estimatedTokens < 50,000: Use single-agent workflow

  • Follow CONTRACT-REVIEW-SKILL.md methodology
  • Two-pass review (Discovery + Amendment)
  • Output: <document>-edits.json

If estimatedTokens >= 50,000: Use multi-agent workflow

  • Follow CONTRACT-REVIEW-AGENTIC-SKILL.md methodology
  • Orchestrator performs discovery, spawns sub-agents
  • Sub-agents work in parallel on assigned sections
  • Merge results into merged-edits.json

Step 4: Discovery Pass

Read all chunks to build the Context Document:

# Read each chunk until hasMore: false
node superdoc-redline.mjs read --input "<document>" --chunk 0 --max-tokens 10000
node superdoc-redline.mjs read --input "<document>" --chunk 1 --max-tokens 10000
# ... continue

Build Context Document with:

  • Defined Terms Registry (all terms and their usage locations)
  • Provisions to change (based on user instructions)
  • Cross-reference map
  • Section map with block ranges

Step 5: Amendment Pass

Single-Agent Path

Process each chunk with full Context Document, drafting exact amendments.

Multi-Agent Path
  1. Plan sub-agent assignments (non-overlapping block ranges)
  2. Spawn sub-agents in parallel using Task tool:
Task({
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  description: "Review [section] blocks b[start]-b[end]",
  prompt: "[Sub-agent prompt with Context Document and block range]"
})
  1. Each sub-agent produces edits-[section].json
  2. Merge all edit files:
node superdoc-redline.mjs merge \
  edits-*.json \
  -o merged-edits.json \
  -c combine \
  -v "<document>"

Step 6: Validate and Apply

# Validate
node superdoc-redline.mjs validate --input "<document>" --edits "<edits-file>"

# Apply with track changes
node superdoc-redline.mjs apply \
  --input "<document>" \
  --output "<document>-amended.docx" \
  --edits "<edits-file>" \
  --author-name "AI Legal Counsel"

Step 7: Report Results

Report to user:

  • Total edits applied
  • Breakdown by category (replacements, deletions, insertions, comments)
  • Output file path
  • Any issues or items needing human review

Reference Documentation

The detailed methodology is documented in:

  • Single-agent workflow: superdoc-redlines/CONTRACT-REVIEW-SKILL.md
  • Multi-agent workflow: superdoc-redlines/CONTRACT-REVIEW-AGENTIC-SKILL.md
  • Library reference: superdoc-redlines/README.md
  • Quick skill reference: superdoc-redlines/SKILL.md

Sub-Agent Prompt Template

When spawning sub-agents for multi-agent workflow, use this template:

You are a contract review sub-agent. Review your assigned section and produce an edits JSON file.

## Assignment
- Block Range: b[START] to b[END]
- Section: [SECTION_NAME]
- Output: edits-[section].json

## Review Instructions
[USER_INSTRUCTIONS]

## Context Document
[FULL_CONTEXT_DOCUMENT]

## Procedure
1. Read your assigned chunks:
   ```bash
   cd /home/tyc/ross-ide-contract/superdoc-redlines
   node superdoc-redline.mjs read --input "[DOCUMENT]" --chunk [N] --max-tokens 10000
  1. For each block in your range, assess amendments needed based on:

    • The review instructions
    • Defined terms changes from Context Document
    • Provisions requiring deletion or replacement
  2. Draft EXACT replacement text (not vague directions)

  3. Create edits file:

    {
      "version": "0.2.0",
      "agent": "[AGENT_ID]",
      "blockRange": { "start": "b[START]", "end": "b[END]" },
      "edits": [...]
    }
    
  4. Save to: edits-[section].json

Rules

  • ONLY edit blocks in your assigned range
  • Draft exact replacement text
  • Use diff: true for surgical edits, diff: false for rewrites
  • Cite Singapore statutes with year (e.g., "Companies Act 1967")

## Working Directory

All commands should be run from:

/home/tyc/ross-ide-contract/superdoc-redlines


## Output Files

| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `<document>-ir.json` | Extracted document structure with block IDs |
| `<document>-context.md` | Context Document (for multi-agent) |
| `edits-*.json` | Edit files from each agent |
| `merged-edits.json` | Combined edits (multi-agent only) |
| `<document>-amended.docx` | Final output with tracked changes |

## Error Handling

- If document doesn't exist: Report error, ask for correct path
- If sub-agent fails: Re-spawn for remaining blocks or process directly
- If merge conflicts: Review and resolve, re-merge with appropriate strategy
- If validation fails: Identify and fix problematic edits, re-validate

Related Skills

GENERAL · contracts

Business Agreement Generator

Generates customized business agreements for 10 common relationship types with plain English annotations. Use when formalizing a business relationshi…

GENERAL · contracts

AI 智能合同审查系统

Automates contract review by identifying clause risks, comparing against standard contracts, and managing contract lifecycles including expiry remind…

luokai0
GENERAL · contracts

amendment-history

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a…

alexchlou
GENERAL · contracts

amendment-history-anthropics

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a…

anthropics
GENERAL · contracts

Amendment History

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a…

stubbi