AML Compliance Program
Drafts board-ready Anti-Money Laundering compliance programs for U.S. financial institutions under BSA/FinCEN requirements. Covers CIP, CDD, EDD, SAR/CTR reporting, OFAC screening, risk assessment, training, independent testing, and governance structures. Use when creating or updating AML policies, BSA compliance programs, or financial institution regulatory documentation. Trigger keywords: AML, BSA, FinCEN, Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering, SAR, CTR, OFAC, CIP, CDD, KYC, compliance program.
AML Compliance Program
Produces a comprehensive, board-ready AML compliance program tailored to a financial institution's risk profile, satisfying BSA, FinCEN, and federal/state requirements.
Checkpoint A: Pre-Draft Intake (Mandatory)
Before drafting, collect from the user:
- Existing policies — current AML program, risk assessments, exam reports, regulatory correspondence
- Institutional profile — org chart, business lines, products, customer demographics, geographic footprint
- Risk data — prior assessments, audit findings, enforcement actions, consent orders
- Applicable regulations — confirm institution type (bank, MSB, broker-dealer) to determine which CFR parts, FinCEN guidance, and agency bulletins apply
Do not proceed until items 1–2 are addressed. Items 3–4 may be developed during drafting if unavailable.
Quick Start
Draft a numbered policy document covering all sections below. Calibrate depth to the institution's size, complexity, and risk profile.
Step 1: Program Foundation
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Board endorsement | Explicit board/senior management approval and oversight |
| Scope | All business lines, customer relationships, geographies, transaction types |
| Risk-based approach | Controls calibrated to risk assessment findings |
| Resource commitment | Adequate personnel, technology, budget |
Step 2: AML Compliance Officer
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Qualifications | CAMS or equivalent; demonstrated BSA/AML expertise |
| Reporting line | Direct to senior management; regular board access |
| Independence | Evaluation tied to compliance effectiveness, not production |
| Authority | Unrestricted access to all records, systems, personnel |
Core duties: Regulatory contact (FinCEN, regulators, law enforcement) · SAR/CTR/BSA filing oversight · risk assessment coordination · training management · independent testing oversight · program design and updates.
Step 3: Customer Identification Program (CIP)
Per 31 CFR § 1020.220:
| Data Point | Individual | Legal Entity |
|---|---|---|
| Full legal name | Required | Required |
| Date of birth | Required | N/A |
| Address | Residential/business street | Principal place of business |
| ID number | SSN/TIN or passport + country | EIN or equivalent |
Verification: Documentary (government ID / incorporation docs) · Non-documentary (consumer reporting, public databases) · Non-face-to-face (additional measures for remote channels).
Retention: 5 years after account closure.
Step 4: Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
Per 31 CFR § 1010.230:
- Identify beneficial owners: each individual ≥25% equity + one with significant management control
- Collect via certification form; verify per CIP standards
- Update ownership on risk-based schedule and upon known changes
- Document relationship purpose, business activities, anticipated activity, source of funds
- Build expected transaction profiles (type, industry, geography, history)
- Ongoing monitoring: automated systems, periodic reviews, exception reporting
Step 5: Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)
Mandatory EDD triggers:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| PEPs | Per FinCEN guidance |
| High-risk geographies | FATF high-risk/monitored jurisdictions |
| Complex ownership | Opaque structures obscuring beneficial ownership |
| High-risk businesses | MSBs, virtual currency exchanges, cash-intensive |
| Elevated risk rating | Multiple risk factors per internal methodology |
Requirements: Background investigation · senior management approval · enhanced monitoring (lower thresholds, more frequent reviews) · documented risk rating methodology (customer × geography × product × activity).
Step 6: Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR)
Per 31 CFR § 1020.320:
- Threshold: ≥ $5,000 where institution knows/suspects illegal activity, BSA evasion, no business purpose, or criminal facilitation
- Deadlines: 30 days (suspect identified) · 60 days (no suspect identified)
- Key indicators: Structuring · activity inconsistent with profile · large currency transactions · wire transfers lacking rationale or involving high-risk jurisdictions · recordkeeping/CIP avoidance · shell company transactions
- Confidentiality: Federal law prohibits disclosure to subjects; civil/criminal penalties for violation; records retained 5 years; need-to-know access only
- Escalation: Immediate report to Compliance Officer; good-faith reporters protected
Step 7: Currency Transaction Reporting (CTR)
Per 31 CFR §§ 1010.310, 1020.310:
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Threshold | Currency transactions > $10,000 per person per business day |
| Aggregation | Multiple transactions by/on behalf of same person in one day |
| Filing deadline | 15 calendar days via BSA E-Filing |
| Currency | Coin and paper money only (excludes cashier's checks, money orders) |
Exemptions (31 CFR § 1020.315): Banks, government entities, listed public companies, qualifying businesses. Require documentation, approval, biennial renewal, annual review.
Step 8: OFAC Compliance
| Trigger | Timing |
|---|---|
| Account opening | Before relationship established |
| Existing customers | Minimum annually; risk-based frequency |
| Transactions (wires, ACH) | Real-time or near real-time |
Lists: SDN, Consolidated Sanctions, country-based programs.
Actions:
- Blocking — mandatory for sanctioned persons' property; interest-bearing account; report to OFAC within 10 business days
- Rejection — prohibited transactions not requiring blocking; notify originator; document decision
Retention: All screening records ≥ 5 years.
Step 9: Risk Assessment
| Dimension | Factors |
|---|---|
| Products/services | Velocity, geographic reach, anonymity, abuse susceptibility |
| Customers | Type, occupation, geography, relationship characteristics |
| Entities | Ownership structure, business purpose, formation jurisdiction |
| Geography | Physical presence, customer concentrations, FATF/State Dept. flags |
Assess inherent (pre-controls) and residual (post-controls) risk. Conduct annually minimum or upon significant changes. Findings drive CDD intensity, monitoring sensitivity, and resource allocation.
Step 10: Training
| Audience | Timing |
|---|---|
| All employees/officers/directors | Annual minimum |
| New hires | Within 30 days or before customer-facing duties |
| High-risk positions | Role-specific schedule with specialized content |
Core curriculum: Institution AML policies · BSA/PATRIOT Act/FinCEN/OFAC · ML/TF typologies · red flags · CIP/CDD procedures · reporting obligations.
Documentation: Attendance records, completion certificates, comprehension assessments.
Step 11: Independent Testing
| Element | Standard |
|---|---|
| Independence | Personnel independent of AML function |
| Frequency | 12–18 months; higher-risk more frequent |
| Reporting | Findings to Compliance Officer, management, board |
Scope: Regulatory compliance · policy adequacy · risk assessment methodology · transaction monitoring effectiveness · training adequacy · SAR/CTR timeliness · CIP/CDD compliance · OFAC procedures.
Remediation: Management response required; action plans with timelines; follow-up verification.
Step 12: Governance
Board duties: Approve program and updates · review risk assessment · receive quarterly compliance reports · review testing results · allocate resources.
Quarterly metrics: SAR/CTR activity, OFAC screening, CDD/EDD activities, training completion, testing findings, regulatory developments.
Change management: Document rationale → compliance + legal review → management/board approval → communicate to personnel → maintain version history.
Step 13: Recordkeeping
| Record Type | Retention |
|---|---|
| SARs + supporting docs | 5 years from filing |
| CTRs + supporting docs | 5 years from filing |
| CIP/CDD/beneficial ownership | 5 years after account closure |
| OFAC screening/blocking | 5 years minimum |
| Risk assessments, testing, training | 5 years minimum |
Organized for prompt retrieval upon regulatory request. Security controls and audit trails for SAR-related records.
Checkpoint B: Post-Draft Review (Mandatory)
After delivering the draft, ask the user:
- Does the program scope match your institution's business lines and risk profile?
- Are the CIP/CDD/EDD thresholds appropriate for your customer base?
- Do the governance and reporting structures align with your board/committee framework?
- Any enforcement history, consent orders, or MRAs that require specific program provisions?
Quality Checks
- [ ] All 13 sections addressed with institution-specific detail
- [ ] CFR citations verified — uncertain citations marked [VERIFY]
- [ ] Risk-based approach: controls scaled to institution size and complexity
- [ ] SAR confidentiality protections embedded in relevant sections
- [ ] OFAC strict-liability posture reflected throughout
- [ ] Retention periods consistent across sections
- [ ] Disclaimer included: framework requires qualified legal counsel review and institution-specific tailoring
Guidelines
- Mark uncertain CFR citations with [VERIFY] — regulations change; confirm at drafting date
- OFAC obligations are strict liability — err on the side of caution in all screening procedures
- SAR confidentiality violations carry serious penalties — embed protections in every relevant procedure and training module
- Program must be reviewed regularly for regulatory changes, emerging risks, and implementation lessons
- Consult legal counsel for interpretation questions
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification
Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and …
Adverse Event Reporting Policy
Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-…
Client Advisory Summary
Drafts U.S. regulatory client advisory summaries translating legal developments into actionable risk and compliance guidance. Use when a client needs…
Annual Report for State Charity Bureau
Generates a cross-referenced U.S. nonprofit annual filing package for state charity-bureau registration. Produces Full Compliance Package, Form-Field…
Legal Audit Summary
Produces structured U.S. legal audit summaries that distill compliance findings into executive-ready risk prioritization and remediation plans, cover…