User Input
[COMMUNITY] Generate GDPR (EU 2016/679) compliance assessment for EU/EEA data processing — legal basis mapping, data subject rights, transfers, DPIA screening, and breach notification across all member states
⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by qualified DPO / RSSI / legal counsel before reliance. Citations to ANSSI / CNIL / EU regulations may lag the current text — verify against the source.
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a GDPR Compliance Assessment (EU 2016/679) for any organisation processing personal data of EU/EEA residents. This command takes a member-state-neutral approach to the EU GDPR baseline. For French-specific CNIL obligations, run $arckit-fr-rgpd after this assessment.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Note: Before generating, scan
projects/for existing project directories. For each project, list allARC-*.mdartifacts, checkexternal/for reference documents, and check000-global/for cross-project policies. If no external docs exist but they would improve output, ask the user.
Step 0: Read existing artifacts from the project context
MANDATORY (warn if missing):
- DATA (Data Model) — Extract: all entities with personal data, special category data (Article 9), data subjects, data flows to third parties, retention periods, data classifications
- If missing: warn that GDPR assessment requires a data model to identify what personal data is processed and how
RECOMMENDED (read if available, note if missing):
- REQ (Requirements) — Extract: data requirements (DR-xxx), compliance requirements (NFR-C-xxx), security requirements (NFR-SEC-xxx), integration points that involve personal data transfer
- STKE (Stakeholder Analysis) — Extract: data subject categories, vulnerable groups, organisation's role (controller / processor), RACI for data governance
- PRIN (Architecture Principles, 000-global) — Extract: privacy by design principles, data minimisation, retention policies
OPTIONAL (read if available, skip silently):
- RISK (Risk Register) — Extract: existing privacy risks, data breach history, third-party risks
- SECD (Secure by Design) — Extract: security controls relevant to Article 32 assessment
Step 0b: Read external documents and policies
- Read any external documents in
external/— extract existing privacy policies, Records of Processing Activities (RoPA), Data Processing Agreements, previous DPIA reports, transfer impact assessments - Read any global policies in
000-global/policies/— extract organisational privacy policy, data retention schedule, data classification scheme, DPO mandate - Citation traceability: When referencing content from external documents, follow
.arckit/references/citation-instructions.md.
Step 1: Identify or Create Project
Identify the target project from the hook context. If the project doesn't exist:
- Use Glob to list
projects/*/directories and find the highestNNN-*number - Calculate the next number (zero-padded to 3 digits)
- Slugify the project name
- Use the Write tool to create
projects/{NNN}-{slug}/README.md - Set
PROJECT_IDandPROJECT_PATH
Step 2: Read Source Artifacts
Read all documents from Step 0. Identify:
- Role: controller / processor / joint controller (from stakeholder analysis or user input)
- Special category data presence (Article 9) → stricter requirements
- International transfers → Schrems II / TIA requirements
- Data subjects: consumers, employees, patients, children?
- Lead supervisory authority: determined by the controller's main establishment
Step 3: GDPR Template Reading
Read the template (with user override support):
- First, check if
.arckit/templates-custom/eu-rgpd-template.mdexists in the project root - If found: Read the user's customized template
- If not found: Read
.arckit/templates/eu-rgpd-template.md
Step 4: DPIA Screening (Article 35 — Automated)
Based on the data model and requirements, automatically score the EDPB 9 criteria:
| # | Criterion | Score YES if... |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluation/scoring | AI/ML profiling, credit scoring, behavioural profiling |
| 2 | Automated decisions | Legal/significant effect without human review |
| 3 | Systematic monitoring | Continuous tracking, surveillance, CCTV, web analytics at scale |
| 4 | Sensitive/special category data | ANY Article 9 category (health, biometric, genetic, etc.) |
| 5 | Large-scale processing | > 5,000 data subjects OR national/regional scope |
| 6 | Matching/combining datasets | Multiple data sources joined for new purposes |
| 7 | Vulnerable data subjects | Children, elderly, patients, job seekers |
| 8 | Innovative technology | AI/ML, biometrics, IoT, blockchain, facial recognition |
| 9 | Prevents exercising rights | No SAR/deletion/portability mechanism |
DPIA Decision:
- 2+ criteria: DPIA REQUIRED (Article 35) → recommend running
$arckit-dpia - 1 criterion: DPIA RECOMMENDED
- 0 criteria: DPIA NOT REQUIRED (but document the screening)
Step 5: Generate GDPR Assessment
CRITICAL: Use the Write tool to create the assessment document.
-
Detect version: Check for existing
ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v*.mdfiles:- No existing file → VERSION="1.0"
- Existing file → minor increment if refreshed, major if scope changed
-
Auto-populate Document Control:
- Document ID:
ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v{VERSION} - Status: DRAFT
- Created Date: {current_date}
- Next Review Date: {current_date + 12 months}
- Classification: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
- Lead Supervisory Authority: determine from controller's main EU establishment
- Document ID:
-
Section 1: Scope and Role Determination
- Organisation role (controller / processor / joint controller / sub-processor)
- Data categories processed (standard personal data, Article 9 special categories, Article 10 criminal data)
-
Section 2: Lawful Basis Assessment (Articles 6 and 9)
- Map each processing activity to Article 6(1) legal basis
- Map each special category processing to Article 9(2) condition
- Consent management: if consent used, assess GDPR consent requirements
- Legitimate interests: flag if used — three-part test required (purpose, necessity, balancing)
-
Section 3: Privacy by Design and Default (Article 25)
- Data minimisation, purpose limitation, storage limitation
- Pseudonymisation, encryption defaults
- Privacy-friendly default settings
-
Section 4: Data Subject Rights (Articles 15–22)
- Implementation mechanism for each right with response times
- Flag any rights without implementation mechanism as gap
-
Section 5: Records of Processing Activities (Article 30)
- RoPA mandatory for organisations with 250+ employees (or processing high-risk/special category data)
- RoPA location and maintenance status
-
Section 6: DPIA Assessment
- Copy DPIA screening results from Step 4
- DPIA status: conducted / required / not required
-
Section 7: Data Processors and Sub-Processors (Article 28)
- Processor inventory from data model data flows
- DPA compliance checklist (processing only on instructions, sub-processor controls, audit rights, deletion/return)
-
Section 8: International Transfers (Articles 44–49)
- Transfer inventory: destination country, transfer mechanism, adequacy decision status
- Post-Schrems II requirements: TIA documented, SCCs 2021 in place, supplementary measures
- EU-US Data Privacy Framework status for US transfers
- Adequacy decision list (current as of 2025)
-
Section 9: Breach Notification (Articles 33–34)
- 72-hour DPA notification process
- Individual notification trigger (high risk)
- Internal breach register
-
Section 10: National Supervisory Authority Context
- Lead DPA determination
- Member-state table (CNIL, BfDI, AP, APD, AGPD, Garante, DPC, IMY)
- Note: for French deployments, run
$arckit-fr-rgpdfor CNIL-specific requirements
-
Section 11: Gap Analysis and Action Plan
- Consolidated gaps from all sections with priority flags
Before writing the file, read .arckit/references/quality-checklist.md and verify all Common Checks pass.
Write the document to:
projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v{VERSION}.md
Step 6: Summary Output
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ GDPR Assessment Generated
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📄 Document: projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v{VERSION}.md
📋 Document ID: {document_id}
📅 Assessment Date: {date}
🔒 Classification: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Assessment Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Role: {Controller / Processor / Joint Controller}
Lead DPA: {Authority name}
Data Subjects: {Categories}
Special Category Data: {Yes (categories) / No}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔍 DPIA Screening: {N}/9 criteria → {REQUIRED / RECOMMENDED / NOT REQUIRED}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
International Transfers: {N} transfers identified
{List destination countries and mechanisms}
Total Gaps: {N} ({N} high, {N} medium, {N} low)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Next steps:
{If DPIA required: 1. Run $arckit-dpia — DPIA required (2+ criteria met)}
{If French deployment: Run $arckit-fr-rgpd — CNIL-specific requirements}
{If AI: Run $arckit-eu-ai-act — AI and personal data intersection}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Important Notes
- Member-state neutral: This command covers EU GDPR only. For French CNIL-specific requirements (cookies, HDS, age of consent 15), run
$arckit-fr-rgpdafter this assessment. - Legitimate interests for public authorities: Article 6(1)(f) legitimate interests CANNOT be used by public authorities for tasks in the exercise of official authority. Flag this explicitly.
- Schrems II is ongoing: Even with the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (DPF), Transfer Impact Assessments remain best practice. DPF is subject to ongoing CJEU challenge.
- DPIA is a legal requirement: When 2+ EDPB criteria are met, the DPIA is mandatory before processing starts. Non-compliance can result in supervisory authority enforcement.
- Use Write Tool: GDPR assessments are typically 3,000–6,000 words. Always use the Write tool.
Key References
| Document | Publisher | URL |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR full text (Regulation 2016/679) | EUR-Lex | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj |
| EDPB — European Data Protection Board (guidelines and opinions) | EDPB | https://edpb.europa.eu/ |
| EU-US Data Privacy Framework | European Commission | https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/eu-us-data-transfers_en |
| CNIL (French DPA) | CNIL | https://www.cnil.fr/ |
| EDPB DPIA guidelines (WP248) | EDPB | https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-92017-data-protection-impact-assessment_en |
| Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) | European Commission | https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/standard-contractual-clauses-scc_en |
| DPA contacts across EU member states | EDPB | https://edpb.europa.eu/about-edpb/about-edpb/members_en |
Success Criteria
- ✅ Assessment document created at
projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v{VERSION}.md - ✅ Organisation role determined (controller / processor / joint)
- ✅ Lead supervisory authority identified
- ✅ All processing activities mapped to Article 6 legal basis
- ✅ Special category data mapped to Article 9 conditions
- ✅ EDPB 9-criteria DPIA screening completed
- ✅ Data subject rights implementation assessed (Articles 15–22)
- ✅ International transfers assessed with Schrems II requirements
- ✅ Processor inventory with DPA compliance checked
- ✅ 72-hour breach notification process assessed
- ✅ National supervisory authority map populated
- ✅ Document classified OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
- ✅ French deployment flagged for
$arckit-fr-rgpdfollow-up
Example Usage
$arckit-eu-rgpd Assess GDPR compliance for a French e-commerce platform expanding to Germany and Spain, processing purchase history, behavioural analytics, and email marketing, using AWS eu-west-3 (Paris) with Salesforce Marketing Cloud (US-based processor)
$arckit-eu-rgpd GDPR assessment for 001 — SaaS HR platform operating across 5 EU member states, processing employee data, using US-based payroll sub-processor
$arckit-eu-rgpd Assess GDPR for a healthcare research project processing anonymised patient data across FR, DE, NL — assess whether anonymisation is complete
Suggested Next Steps
After completing this command, consider running:
$arckit-dpia-- Run a full Data Protection Impact Assessment if screening flags 2+ high-risk criteria (when DPIA screening score is 2 or more)$arckit-fr-rgpd-- Add French CNIL-specific obligations on top of the EU GDPR baseline (when Project processes personal data of French residents or is operated by a French entity)$arckit-eu-ai-act-- Assess AI Act obligations where AI systems process personal data (when Project uses AI or automated decision-making involving personal data)
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Age Verification and Estimation Methods
Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, sel…
Conducting AI System Privacy Assessment
Guides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training da…
Managing APAC Cross-Border Transfers
Guides management of cross-border data transfers under Asia-Pacific regulatory frameworks including APEC CBPR, ASEAN Model Contractual Clauses, Japan…
APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules Certification
Guides APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system certification process including self-assessment against the APEC Privacy Framework principles, accounta…
User Input
[COMMUNITY] Assess NIS2 Directive compliance obligations for EU member state operators of essential services and important entities