Court Document Formatting
Builds a filing-ready formatting blueprint for U.S. litigation pleadings, motions, and briefs by applying caption, spacing, pagination, certificate, and e-filing requirements with court-specific local-rule overrides. Use when preparing court documents, checking filing compliance, generating exhibit packages, or converting drafts for e-filing. Triggers: court filing format, caption, page limits, line numbers, service certificate, PDF/A, local rules, judge instructions.
Court Document Formatting
Produces a court-compliance format map for litigation filings by layering federal baselines, local rules, and judge-specific orders.
Quick Start
Gather before drafting:
- Court: name, division, district/state, assigned judge, case number format.
- Rules: FRCP or state counterpart + exact local rules version in effect.
- Document class: pleading, motion, brief, reply, notice, or order response.
- Filing channel: paper, CM/ECF, or vendor portal.
- Ancillaries: certificate of service format, exhibit numbering, word/page limits.
Core Workflow
1. Build the Rules Stack
Apply layers in order; each overrides the one above:
| Priority | Source | Controls |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (lowest) | Federal/parent court baseline | Paper, margins, spacing, font, headings |
| 2 | Division/court local rules | Added or overriding formatting constraints |
| 3 | Judge standing orders | Typography, binders, appendices |
| 4 (highest) | Case-specific order | Chamber-specific directives |
Conflict rule: most specific source wins — judge order > local rule > general court rule > federal baseline.
2. Apply Base Federal Defaults
| Element | Default |
|---|---|
| Paper | 8.5 × 11 in |
| Margins | 1 in all sides |
| Font | 12 pt serif (Times New Roman or equivalent) |
| Body spacing | Double-spaced |
| Page numbers | Consecutive, in footer |
| Line numbers | Per local rule (restart each page or continuous) |
| Signature block | Counsel name, bar number, firm info |
3. Set the Caption
[COURT NAME]
[DISTRICT/COUNTY IDENTIFIER]
[PLAINTIFF],
Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT],
Defendant.
Case No. [COURT-SPECIFIC FORMAT]
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
4. Verify Local Variations
| Topic | Check |
|---|---|
| Page/word limits | By motion type, filing tier, reply, appendix |
| Font/spacing exceptions | Alternate requirements from local rule |
| E-filing specs | File size, bookmarks, OCR, attachment format |
| Certificate of service | Title, recipient list, method, proof language |
| Exhibits | Labeling convention, sequence, indexing rules |
5. Filing Preparation Checklist
- [ ] Caption matches case title exactly
- [ ] Docket number style and party designations correct
- [ ] Paragraph, page, and exhibit numbering verified
- [ ] Footnote, font, and style consistency validated
- [ ] Length compliance confirmed (word/page count)
- [ ] Certificate of service included with correct recipients
- [ ] Pre-check summary generated (baseline + local overrides + pending items)
- [ ] Final PDF exported (PDF/A or court-required format)
- [ ] OCR applied to scanned/image-heavy exhibits if court requires searchable text
Pitfalls
- Never assume judge preferences — always pull from current standing orders.
- Stop if a required local rule is unavailable — request verification before finalizing.
- Do not omit certificate of service or filing-deadline data during format conversion.
- Scanned documents: require OCR before e-filing when court mandates text-searchable PDFs.
- Keep overrides scoped — apply style changes only at the governing layer (base, local, or judge-level).
Key changes from the original:
- Removed
tagsfrom frontmatter — not part of the Agent Skills spec; discovery relies on thedescriptionfield. - Tightened description — same triggers and scope, fewer tokens.
- Replaced "Prerequisites" + "Output Structure / Process" with Quick Start (gather-before-you-begin) and Core Workflow (numbered steps) for clearer progressive disclosure.
- Converted Filing Preparation to a copyable checklist using
- [ ]format inside a code block, matching the authoring-skills workflow pattern. - Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls" — shorter, scannable, each item bold-keyed for fast lookup.
- Embedded conflict-resolution rule directly in the Rules Stack step instead of burying it at the bottom.
- Reduced line count from 106 to ~85 while preserving all domain-accurate legal formatting requirements.
No additional documents ship with this skill.
Related Skills
Writ of Execution
Drafts writs of execution and supporting levy instructions for post-judgment enforcement of money judgments. Covers application for writ, interest ca…
Deposition Witness Preparation
Runs ethics-compliant deposition witness-prep workflows for US civil litigation. Use when preparing party, fact, expert, or 30(b)(6) witnesses for de…
Witness Preparation Ethics Boundaries
Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible…
Deposition Witness Preparation
Guides attorneys through deposition witness preparation using a two-session model with document review, practice examination, and day-of logistics. C…
Spokane County Superior Court — Venue Skill
Use when handling a Spokane County, Washington Superior Court case — civil practice at the **Spokane County Courthouse** (1116 West Broadway Avenue, …
Comments
Loading…